ArticleJournal of cardiovascular translational research2024
Automated Data Transformation and Feature Extraction for Oxygenation-Sensitive Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Images.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular translational research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Vasoactive breathing manoeuvres as an effective coronary vasodilator in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: a prospective comparative oxygenation-sensitive CMR study.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oxygenation-sensitive cardiovascular magnetic resonance (OS-CMR) is a novel, powerful tool for assessing coronary function in vivo. The data extraction and analysis however are labor-intensive. The objective of this study was to provide an automated approach for the extraction, visualization, and biomarker selection of OS-CMR images. We created a Python-based tool to automate extraction and export of raw patient data, featuring 3336 attributes per participant, into a template compatible with common data analytics frameworks, including the functionality to select predictive features for the given disease state. Each analysis was completed in about 2 min. The features selected by both ANOVA and MIC significantly outperformed (p < 0.001) the null set and complete set of features in two datasets, with mean AUROC scores of 0.89eatures f 0.94lete set of features in two datasets, with mean AUROC scores that our tool is suitable for automated data extraction and analysis of OS-CMR images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38229001What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.