Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38228990›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2024

Patients' and Clinicians' Experiences with In-person, Video, and Phone Modalities for Opioid Use Disorder Treatment: A Qualitative Study.

Tamar Wyte-Lake, Deborah J Cohen, Shannon Williams, David Casey, Matt Chan, Brian Frank, Ximena A Levander, Dan Stein, Katie Kirkman White, Steffani R Bailey

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tamar Wyte-LakeDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA. wytelake@ohsu.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8449-7701
Deborah J CohenDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Shannon WilliamsDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
David CaseyDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Matt ChanDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Brian FrankDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Ximena A LevanderDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Dan SteinDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Katie Kirkman WhiteDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Steffani R BaileyDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Oregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

NW Center of Excellence & K12 in Patient Centered Learning Health Systems ScienceK12HS026370 · AHRQ · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI EDEN, KAREN BEEKMAN, GUISE, JEANNE-MARIE · 2018 to 2022
$4.0M
REMOTE: tREatMent for Opioid use via TElemedicineR21DA054261 · NIDA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI BAILEY, STEFFANI R · 2021 to 2022
$424k
AHRQ HHS K12 HS026370NIDA NIH HHS 1R21DA054261-01NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA054261
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOpioid use disorder (OUD) is a chronic condition that requires regular visits and care continuity. Telehealth implementation has created multiple visit modalities for OUD care. There is limited knowledge of patients' and clinicians' perceptions and experiences related to multi-modality care and when different modalities might be best employed.

objectiveTo identify patients' and clinicians' experiences with multiple visit modalities for OUD treatment in primary care.

designComparative case study, using video- and telephone-based semi-structured interviews.

participantsPatients being treated for OUD (n = 19) and clinicians who provided OUD care (n = 15) from two primary care clinics within the same healthcare system. APPROACH: Using an inductive approach, interviews were analyzed to identify patients' and clinicians' experiences with receiving/delivering OUD care via different visit modalities. Clinicians' and patients' experiences were compared using a group analytical process. KEY

resultsPatients and clinicians valued having multiple modalities available for care, with flexibility identified as a key benefit. Patients highlighted the decreased burden of travel and less social anxiety with telehealth visits. Similarly, clinicians reported that telehealth decreased medical intrusion into the lives of patients stable in recovery. Patients and clinicians saw the value of in-person visits when establishing care and for patients needing additional support. In-person visits allowed the ability to conduct urine drug testing, and to foster relationships and trust building, which were more difficult, but not impossible via a telehealth visit. Patients preferred telephone over video visits, as these were more private and more convenient. Clinicians identified benefits of video, including being able to both hear and see the patient, but often deferred to patient preference.

conclusionsConsiderations for utilization of visit modalities for OUD care were identified based on patients' needs and preferences, which often changed over the course of treatment. Continued research is needed determine how visit modalities impact patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Opioid-Related DisordersQualitative ResearchTelemedicineAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionPrimary Health CareTelephoneVideoconferencingCliniciansOpioid use disorderOpioid use disorder treatmentPatientsPrimary careTelehealthUrine drug testing.

Identifiers

PMID38228990
PMCPMC11347548
OpenAlexW4390904091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.