ArticleInsights into imaging2024
METhodological RadiomICs Score (METRICS): a quality scoring tool for radiomics research endorsed by EuSoMII.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 209 papers, 35 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
209 citing papers in PubMed, 35 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Computational and AI-Enabled Imaging Biomarkers for Predicting and Assessing Immunotherapy Response in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review with Functional Meta-Synthesis.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Pooled it
- Radiomics for differentiating ruptured intracranial aneurysms: overview, methodological quality evaluation using METRICS and RQS, and feature transportability validation using independent multi-center dataset.European radiology · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial-intelligence models vs. radiologists in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer on mpMRI: a meta-analysis.European radiology · 2026Pooled it
- Radiomics as a tool for predicting biochemical recurrence after total prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International urology and nephrology · 2026Pooled it
- Prediction of PD-L1 expression in nonsmall cell lung cancer using artificial intelligence models based on radiomics: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026Pooled it
- CT and MRI radiomics in cardiovascular risk prediction: a systematic review and meta-analysis by the EuSoMII Radiomics Auditing Group.European radiology · 2026Pooled it
- Magnetic resonance imaging radiomics for predicting hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence following resection or ablation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Pooled it
- Deep learning for synthetic PET imaging: a systematic mapping review of techniques, metrics, and clinical relevance.European radiology experimental · 2026Pooled it
- Image Quality Standardization in Radiomics: A Systematic Review of Artifacts, Variability, and Feature Stability.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Pooled it
- Deep learning models for pancreatic cancer detection on CT: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- MRI-based radiomics for noninvasive prediction of GPC3 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Radiomics-based machine learning in the prediction of peritoneal metastasis in ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical imaging · 2025Pooled it
- Application of Deep Learning for Predicting Hematoma Expansion in Intracerebral Hemorrhage Using Computed Tomography Scans: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy.La Radiologia medica · 2025Pooled it
- MRI-based radiomics for differentiating high-grade from low-grade clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Pooled it
- Diagnostic performance of radiomics models for preoperative prediction of microsatellite instability status in endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Pooled it
- Predicting 1p/19q Codeletion Status in Glioma Using MRI-Derived Radiomics: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2025Pooled it
- Convolutional neural network models of structural MRI for discriminating categories of cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Radiomics for differentiating radiation-induced brain injury from recurrence in gliomas: systematic review, meta-analysis, and methodological quality evaluation using METRICS and RQS.European radiology · 2025Pooled it
- Radiomics for prediction of perineural invasion in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Pooled it
149 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
60 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo propose a new quality scoring tool, METhodological RadiomICs Score (METRICS), to assess and improve research quality of radiomics studies.
methodsWe conducted an online modified Delphi study with a group of international experts. It was performed in three consecutive stages: Stage#1, item preparation; Stage#2, panel discussion among EuSoMII Auditing Group members to identify the items to be voted; and Stage#3, four rounds of the modified Delphi exercise by panelists to determine the items eligible for the METRICS and their weights. The consensus threshold was 75%. Based on the median ranks derived from expert panel opinion and their rank-sum based conversion to importance scores, the category and item weights were calculated.
resultIn total, 59 panelists from 19 countries participated in selection and ranking of the items and categories. Final METRICS tool included 30 items within 9 categories. According to their weights, the categories were in descending order of importance: study design, imaging data, image processing and feature extraction, metrics and comparison, testing, feature processing, preparation for modeling, segmentation, and open science. A web application and a repository were developed to streamline the calculation of the METRICS score and to collect feedback from the radiomics community.
conclusionIn this work, we developed a scoring tool for assessing the methodological quality of the radiomics research, with a large international panel and a modified Delphi protocol. With its conditional format to cover methodological variations, it provides a well-constructed framework for the key methodological concepts to assess the quality of radiomic research papers. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: A quality assessment tool, METhodological RadiomICs Score (METRICS), is made available by a large group of international domain experts, with transparent methodology, aiming at evaluating and improving research quality in radiomics and machine learning. KEY POINTS: • A methodological scoring tool, METRICS, was developed for assessing the quality of radiomics research, with a large international expert panel and a modified Delphi protocol. • The proposed scoring tool presents expert opinion-based importance weights of categories and items with a transparent methodology for the first time. • METRICS accounts for varying use cases, from handcrafted radiomics to entirely deep learning-based pipelines. • A web application has been developed to help with the calculation of the METRICS score ( https://metricsscore.github.io/metrics/METRICS.html ) and a repository created to collect feedback from the radiomics community ( https://github.com/metricsscore/metrics ).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.