Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38228808›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Evaluating YOLO architectures for detecting road killed endangered Brazilian animals.

Gabriel Souto Ferrante, Luis Hideo Vasconcelos Nakamura, Sandra Sampaio, Geraldo Pereira Rocha Filho, Rodolfo Ipolito Meneguette

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Gabriel Souto FerranteInstitute of Science Mathematics and Computer Science, University of São Paulo, 400 Trabalhador São-carlense Avenue, São Carlos, São Paulo, 13566-590, Brazil. g.ferrante@usp.br.
Luis Hideo Vasconcelos NakamuraDepartament of Informatics, Federal Institute of São Paulo - Campus Catanduva, 239 Pastor José Dutra de Moraes Avenue, Catanduva, São Paulo, 15808-305, Brazil.
Sandra SampaioDepartment of Computer Science, University of Manchester, Oxford Rd, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Geraldo Pereira Rocha FilhoDepartment of Exact and Technological Sciences, State University of Southwest Bahia, Estr. Bem Querer, Km-04, Vitória da Conquista, BA, 45083-900, Brazil.
Rodolfo Ipolito MeneguetteInstitute of Science Mathematics and Computer Science, University of São Paulo, 400 Trabalhador São-carlense Avenue, São Carlos, São Paulo, 13566-590, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BRFederal Institute of São Paulo · BRSouthwest Bahia State University · BRUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo #2020/07162-0Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo #22/00660-0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wildlife roadkill is a recurring, dangerous problem that affects both humans and animals and has received increasing attention from environmentalists worldwide. Addressing this problem is difficult due to the high investments required in road infrastructure to effectively reduce wildlife vehicle collisions. Despite recent applications of machine learning techniques in low-cost and economically viable detection systems, e.g., for alerting drivers about the presence of animals and collecting statistics on endangered animal species, the success and wide adoption of these systems depend heavily on the availability of data for system training. The lack of training data negatively impacts the feature extraction of machine learning models, which is crucial for successful animal detection and classification. In this paper, we evaluate the performance of several state-of-the-art object detection models on limited data for model training. The selected models are based on the YOLO architecture, which is well-suited for and commonly used in real-time object detection. These include the YoloV4, Scaled-YoloV4, YoloV5, YoloR, YoloX, and YoloV7 models. We focus on Brazilian endangered animal species and use the BRA-Dataset for model training. We also assess the effectiveness of data augmentation and transfer learning techniques in our evaluation. The models are compared using summary metrics such as precision, recall, mAP, and FPS and are qualitatively analyzed considering classic computer vision problems. The results show that the architecture with the best results against false negatives is Scaled-YoloV4, while the best FPS detection score is the nano version of YoloV5.

Indexed as

Animals, WildBenchmarkingAnimalsBrazilCompulsive BehaviorEndangered SpeciesHumans

Identifiers

PMID38228808
PMCPMC10791680
OpenAlexW4390913820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.