Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38228731›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2024

A randomized open-label clinical trial on the effect of Amantadine on post Covid 19 fatigue.

Ali Amini Harandi, Hossein Pakdaman, Aida Medghalchi, Negin Kimia, Alireza Kazemian, Fatemeh Siavoshi, Siavash Shirzadeh Barough, Akram Esfandani, Mohammad Hossein Hosseini, Seyed Ali Sobhanian

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials for the Treatment of Long COVID Syndrome.Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives · 2026
    Article
  5. The Redesign of the Molecular Scaffold of Viral Ion Channel Blockers.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Evaluating myelophil, a 30% ethanol extract ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ali Amini HarandiBrain Mapping Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. ali.amini.harandi@gmail.com.
Hossein PakdamanBrain Mapping Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Aida MedghalchiBrain Mapping Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Negin KimiaBrain Mapping Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Alireza KazemianBrain Mapping Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Fatemeh SiavoshiBrain Mapping Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Siavash Shirzadeh BaroughBrain Mapping Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Akram EsfandaniBrain Mapping Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad Hossein HosseiniBrain Mapping Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Seyed Ali SobhanianPharmacy Department, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · IRIslamic Azad University Medical Branch of Tehran · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many COVID-19 survivors experience lingering post-COVID-19 symptoms, notably chronic fatigue persisting for months after the acute phase. Despite its prevalence, limited research has explored effective treatments for post-COVID-19 fatigue. This randomized controlled clinical trial assessed the impact of Amantadine on patients with post-COVID-19 fatigue. The intervention group received Amantadine for two weeks, while the control group received no treatment. Fatigue levels were assessed using the Visual Analog Fatigue Scale (VAFS) and Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) questionnaires before and after the trial. At the study's onset, VAFS mean scores were 7.90 ± 0.60 in the intervention group and 7.34 ± 0.58 in the control group (P-value = 0.087). After two weeks, intervention group scores dropped to 3.37 ± 0.44, significantly lower than the control group's 5.97 ± 0.29 (P-value < 0.001). Similarly, FSS mean scores at the trial's commencement were 53.10 ± 5.96 in the intervention group and 50.38 ± 4.88 in the control group (P-value = 0.053). At the trial's end, intervention group scores decreased to 28.40 ± 2.42, markedly lower than the control group's 42.59 ± 1.50 (P-value < 0.001). In this study, we report the safety, tolerability, and substantial fatigue-relieving effects of Amantadine in post-COVID-19 fatigue. The intervention demonstrates a statistically significant reduction in fatigue levels, suggesting Amantadine's potential as an effective treatment for this persistent condition.

Indexed as

COVID-19Multiple SclerosisAmantadineHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeAmantadine

Identifiers

PMID38228731
PMCPMC10792128
OpenAlexW4390915033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.