Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38228716›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Isolation and characterization of novel Bacillus strains with superior probiotic potential: comparative analysis and safety evaluation.

Mohsen Golnari, Nastaran Bahrami, Zahra Milanian, Mohammad Rabbani Khorasgani, Mohammad Ali Asadollahi, Rasoul Shafiei, Seyed Safa-Ali Fatemi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
20.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Safety Evaluation ofFood science & nutrition · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Identification ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Characterization ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Metagenomic analysis of the gut microbiota inFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  18. Probiotic properties ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  19. Anti-inflammatory effect of aFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  20. Biocontrol efficiency of nativeCurrent research in microbial sciences · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mohsen GolnariDepartment of Biotechnology, Faculty of Biological Science and Technology, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.
Nastaran BahramiDepartment of Microbiology, NourDanesh Institute of Higher Education, Meymeh, Iran.
Zahra MilanianDepartment of Biotechnology, Faculty of Biological Science and Technology, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.
Mohammad Rabbani KhorasganiDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Biological Science and Technology, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran. m.rabbani@sci.ui.ac.ir.
Mohammad Ali AsadollahiDepartment of Biotechnology, Faculty of Biological Science and Technology, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran. ma.asadollahi@ast.ui.ac.ir.
Rasoul ShafieiDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Biological Science and Technology, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.
Seyed Safa-Ali FatemiDepartment of Systems Biotechnology, Institute of Industrial and Environmental Biotechnology, National Institute for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (NIGEB), Tehran, Iran.
Isfahan University of Technology · IRNational Institute of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology · IRSadra Institute Of Higher Education · IR

Funding

Ehyagaran Ghalb Sanat Asia 94/146295
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the current use of some Bacillus spp. as probiotics, looking for and introducing new efficient and safe potential probiotic strains is one of the most important topics in both microbiology and food industry. This study aimed to isolate, identify, and evaluate the probiotic characteristics and safety of some Bacillus spp. from natural sources. Thirty-six spore-forming, Gram-positive, and catalase-positive Bacillus isolates were identified in 54 samples of soil, feces and dairy products. Bacterial identification was performed using 16S rDNA sequencing. To evaluate the probiotic potential of isolates, the resistance of bacterial cells to simulated gastrointestinal tract (GIT) conditions, the presence of enterotoxin genes, their susceptibility to antibiotics, antimicrobial and hemolytic activities and biochemical profiles were investigated. The results revealed that eight sporulating Bacillus spp. isolates fulfilled all tested probiotic criteria. They showed a high growth rate, non-hemolytic and lecithinase activity, and resistance to simulated GIT conditions. These strains exhibited broad-spectrum antibacterial activity against pathogenic bacteria. In addition, they did not exhibit antibacterial resistance to the 12 tested antibiotics. The results of this study suggest that these isolates can be considered as candidates for functional foods and as safe additives to improve diet quality.

Indexed as

BacillusGastrointestinal DiseasesProbioticsAnti-Bacterial AgentsFecesHumansAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID38228716
PMCPMC10791968
OpenAlexW4390953960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.