Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38228696›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Validity of assessing level walking with the 2D motion analysis software TEMPLO and reliability of 3D marker application.

Klaus Widhalm, Sebastian Durstberger, Andrea Greisberger, Brigitte Wolf, Peter Putz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Posture Status Differences Between Preschool Boys and Girls.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2025
    Article
  5. Validity and Reliability of KinoveaSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Establishing the Reliability of the GaitONSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Klaus WidhalmFH Campus Wien, University of Applied Sciences, Health Sciences, Vienna, Austria. klaus.widhalm@fh-campuswien.ac.at.
Sebastian DurstbergerFH Campus Wien, University of Applied Sciences, Health Sciences, Vienna, Austria.
Andrea GreisbergerFH Campus Wien, University of Applied Sciences, Health Sciences, Vienna, Austria.
Brigitte WolfFH Campus Wien, University of Applied Sciences, Health Sciences, Vienna, Austria.
Peter PutzFH Campus Wien, University of Applied Sciences, Health Sciences, Vienna, Austria.
Hochschule Campus Wien · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In gait analysis, knowledge on validity and reliability of instruments and influences caused by the examiner's performance is of crucial interest. These measurement properties are not yet known for commonly used, low-cost two-dimensional (2D) video-based systems. The purpose of this study was to assess the concurrent validity of a video-based 2D system against a three-dimensional (3D) reference standard, as well as the inter-rater reliability, and test-retest reliability of 3D marker application. Level walking was captured simultaneously by a 2D and a 3D system. Reflective markers were applied independently by three raters and repeated by one rater on a second day. We assessed the agreement between the two systems, as well as reproducibility, and inter-rater agreement of derived spatio-temporal parameters and sagittal kinematics. Nineteen healthy participants completed this study. 2D gait analysis provides a possibility to accurately assess parameters such as stride time, stride length, gait velocity, and knee RoM. Interrater and test-retest reliability of 3D gait analysis are generally acceptable, except for the parameters toe-off and pelvic RoM. This is the first study to publish measurement properties of a commercially available 2D video-based gait analysis system, which can support interpretation of gait pattern near the sagittal plane.

Indexed as

GaitWalkingBiomechanical PhenomenaGait AnalysisHumansReproducibility of ResultsSoftware

Identifiers

PMID38228696
PMCPMC10792076
OpenAlexW4390904294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.