ArticleScientific reports2024
Prediction of sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients based on preoperative features: a deep machine learning approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI Trustworthiness in the Perioperative Period for Patients with Serious Illness: Scoping Narrative Review.JMIR perioperative medicine · 2026Article
- Predicting sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer using an interpretable machine learning approach based on multi-domain clinical features.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2026Article
- Deep-learning-based breast cancer stage prediction from H&E-stained whole-slide images in resource-constrained settings.Journal of pathology informatics · 2026Article
- The Evaluation of Combined Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging and Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion Weighted Imaging in Preoperatively Predicting Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis of Breast Cancer.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
- Multiparametric MRI-Based Prediction Model for Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis in Breast Cancer: Integrating Quantitative Imaging Parameters and Reproductive History.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Machine Learning Based Assessment of Inguinal Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Vulva.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Role of Progesterone Receptor Level in Predicting Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Clinical T1-T2N0 Luminal Type Breast Cancer.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Development of fully automated deep-learning-based approach for prediction of sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients using ultrasound imaging.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Construction of a prediction model for axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients based on a multimodal fusion strategy of ultrasound and pathological images.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is the standard surgical approach to detect lymph node metastasis in breast cancer. Machine learning is a novel tool that provides better accuracy for predicting positive SLN involvement in breast cancer patients. This study obtained data from 2890 surgical cases of breast cancer patients from two referral hospitals in Iran from 2000 to 2021. Patients whose SLN involvement status was identified were included in our study. The dataset consisted of preoperative features, including patient features, gestational factors, laboratory data, and tumoral features. In this study, TabNet, an end-to-end deep learning model, was proposed to predict SLN involvement in breast cancer patients. We compared the accuracy of our model with results from logistic regression analysis. A total of 1832 patients with an average age of 51 ± 12 years were included in our study, of which 697 (25.5%) had SLN involvement. On average, the TabNet model achieved an accuracy of 75%, precision of 81%, specificity of 70%, sensitivity of 87%, and AUC of 0.74, while the logistic model demonstrated an accuracy of 70%, precision of 73%, specificity of 65%, sensitivity of 79%, F1 score of 73%, and AUC of 0.70 in predicting the SLN involvement in patients. Vascular invasion, tumor size, core needle biopsy pathology, age, and FH had the most contributions to the TabNet model. The TabNet model outperformed the logistic regression model in all metrics, indicating that it is more effective in predicting SLN involvement in breast cancer patients based on preoperative data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.