ArticleBDJ open2024
Distress and well-being in dentists: performance of a screening tool for assessment.
Article in BDJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence of Depressive, Anxiety, and Stress Symptoms Among Dentists at an Academic Institution: A Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Occurrence and associated factors of self-reported medical errors among Chinese physicians and nurses: a cross-sectional survey.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
- Suicidal Ideation, Lifestyle Factors, and Burnout Syndrome Among Spanish Professionals in Implant Dentistry: A Survey-Based Cross-Sectional Observational Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- General Practitioners' Mental Well-Being During Crises: Results of the PRICOV-19 Study Pilot in Serbia.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Burnout level evaluation of undergraduate dental college students at middle eastern university.BMC medical education · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesDentists' well-being is being challenged today by many factors. However, effective screening tools to assess their distress and well-being are yet to be validated. The present study aims to evaluate the ability of the Well-Being Index (WBI) to identify distress and stratify dentists' well-being and their likelihood for adverse professional consequences. METHOD AND MATERIALS: A convenience sample of dentists completed a web-based 9-item WBI survey along with other instruments that measured quality of life (QOL), fatigue, burnout, and questions about suicidal ideation, recent dental error, and intent to leave their current job.
resultsA total of 597 dentists completed the survey. The overall mean WBI score was 2.3. The mean WBI score was significantly greater in dentists with low QOL than among dentists without low QOL (4.1 vs 1.6, p < 0.001). Dentists with extreme fatigue, burnout, and suicidal ideation had significantly higher mean WBI score than those without distress (all p < 0.001). WBI score stratified the dentists' likelihood of reporting a recent dental error and intent to leave their current job.
conclusionThe WBI may be a useful screening tool to assess well-being among dentists and identify those in distress and at risk for adverse professional consequences.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.