Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38228600›Full record

ArticleBDJ open2024

Detection of viable oral bacteria of the patient on the surgical mask of dentists.

Madline Priska Gund, Jusef Naim, Janina Lang, Matthias Hannig, Barbara Gärtner, Alexander Halfmann, Gabor Boros, Stefan Rupf

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BDJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Madline Priska GundDepartment of Operative Dentistry, Periodontology and Preventive Dentistry, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany. madline.gund@uks.eu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9053-8864
Jusef NaimDepartment of Operative Dentistry, Periodontology and Preventive Dentistry, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany.
Janina LangDepartment of Operative Dentistry, Periodontology and Preventive Dentistry, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany.
Matthias HannigDepartment of Operative Dentistry, Periodontology and Preventive Dentistry, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany.
Barbara GärtnerInstitute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Department of Hospital Hygiene, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany.
Alexander HalfmannInstitute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Department of Hospital Hygiene, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany.
Gabor BorosOral Surgery Clinic, German Armed Forces Central Hospital, Koblenz, Germany.
Stefan RupfDepartment of Operative Dentistry, Periodontology and Preventive Dentistry, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany.
Saarland University · DEBundeswehrzentralkrankenhaus Koblenz · DEInstitute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND

aimBioaerosols contaminate the personal protective equipment (PPE), especially masks. The PPE harbors microorganisms from various sources. However, no previous studies have investigated the specific sources of bacteria found on used masks and their correlation with those from the treated patient. SETTING, DESIGN, MATERIAL AND

methodsIntraoral samples from the patient were collected prior to dental aerosol-producing treatments using a nylon flock fiber swab. After treatment, the practitioner's mask was imprinted onto agar plates. MAIN OUTCOME

methodsFollowing cultivation, colony forming units were counted and identified using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). After the samples were analyzed, the intraoral samples as well as the mask samples were assessed for the presence of identical species, which were subsequently quantified.

results126 treatments were included. One species match occurred most frequently (26.2%), followed by two (11.9%%) and three or more (3.97%). In the intraoral samples, Neisseria subflava occurred most often, within mask samples Staphylococcus epidermidis were detected most. Staphylococcus aureus could be cultivated three times more often in intraoral samples than on the mask. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionOral microorganisms originating from the patient's oral cavity can be found on the outside of masks. When using PPE during treatments, it should therefore always be in mind that potentially pathogenic microorganisms may land on the mask becoming a source of for itself.

Identifiers

PMID38228600
PMCPMC10791691
OpenAlexW4390906131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.