ReviewVaccine2024
How manufacturing won or lost the COVID-19 vaccine race.
Review in Vaccine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Macular and retinal manifestations following COVID-19 vaccinations: a 2025 update systematic review and meta-analysis.Eye (London, England) · 2026Pooled it
- From bench to bedside: Overcoming translational hurdles in nanoparticle research with pharmacokinetic modeling.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2026Review
- Microbial cell-free protein synthesis and its progression toward industrial use.Microbiology (Reading, England) · 2026Review
- Critical Path to First-in-Human Batches of ChAdOx Vectors, Including for Emergency Response.Vaccines · 2026Article
- Industrial Perspective on the Manufacturing of Lipid Nanoparticles for Nucleic Acid Delivery.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Making Advanced Therapies Affordable and Accessible: Two Strategic Approaches.Developing world bioethics · 2026Article
- Updated profiling of COVID-19 vaccine adverse events using VAERS case reports.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Learning from pandemics: Feature selection and clustering for robust digital disease nowcasting.PloS one · 2026Article
- Phase 1 Randomized Controlled Trial of the Safety and Immunogenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 (Omicron BA.5) mRNA-CR-04 Vaccine in Adults 18-49 Years of Age.Open forum infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Expanding modeling boundaries to design more resilient vaccine supply networks.Health care management science · 2025Article
- Online Information About Side Effects and Safety Concerns of Semaglutide: Mixed Methods Study of YouTube Videos.JMIR infodemiology · 2025Article
- Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The development of vaccines for COVID-19 occurred at an unprecedented pace, and 32 vaccines using a broad range of technologies had received authorization for use on an emergency basis by the end of 2021, from either a national regulatory authority or the World Health Organization. However, 27 of those 32 vaccines had little impact on the global course of the pandemic. Only five vaccines, from AstraZeneca, Pfizer/BioNTech, Sinovac, Moderna, and Sinopharm, were manufactured, authorized, and distributed in time to significantly impact the number of deaths worldwide. Together, these five vaccines averted an estimated 17 million deaths in the first year of the vaccination campaign. The shared characteristic of these five manufacturers was their ability to rapidly develop and scale up vaccine production to deliver the large manufacturing volumes required to immunize large segments of the global population. Because the development and manufacturing of these vaccines was generally on the critical path to authorization and supply, the technical activities involved with development, scale-up, testing, technology transfer, and full-scale manufacturing, as well as aspects of the Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls (CMC) regulatory interactions, are examined for each vaccine and technology for which information is available in the public domain to provide lessons learned and recommendations on proactive actions to better prepare us for a future pandemic response. The critical success factors include prior experience with commercialization and approval, robust quality systems, rigorous process development strategies, flexible manufacturing facilities with a skilled workforce, collaboration, access to consumables, reagents, and adjuvants (if relevant), and an equitable distribution of the global vaccine manufacturing network.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.