Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38228188›Full record

ArticleBiology letters2024

Noise constrains heterospecific eavesdropping more than conspecific reception of alarm calls.

You Zhou, Andrew N Radford, Robert D Magrath

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. To flee or wait and see? Response of incubating white-browed scrubwrens to information about danger.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

You ZhouDivision of Ecology & Evolution, Research School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID 0009-0002-9758-9378
Andrew N RadfordSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5470-3463
Robert D MagrathDivision of Ecology & Evolution, Research School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9109-609X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many vertebrates eavesdrop on alarm calls of other species, as well as responding to their own species' calls, but eavesdropping on heterospecific alarm calls might be harder than conspecific reception when environmental conditions make perception or recognition of calls difficult. This could occur because individuals lack hearing specializations for heterospecific calls, have less familiarity with them, or require more details of call structure to identify calls they have learned to recognize. We used a field playback experiment to provide a direct test of whether noise, as an environmental perceptual challenge, reduces response to heterospecific compared to conspecific alarm calls. We broadcast superb fairy-wren (

Indexed as

PasseriformesSongbirdsAnimalsHumansLearningNoiseVocalization, Animalacoustic communicationalarm callambient noiseanti-predator behaviourbirdsheterospecific eavesdropping

Identifiers

PMID38228188
PMCPMC10791513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.