Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38227668›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

Population encoding of stimulus features along the visual hierarchy.

Luciano Dyballa, Andra M Rudzite, Mahmood S Hoseini, Mishek Thapa, Michael P Stryker, Greg D Field, Steven W Zucker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Luciano DyballaDepartment of Computer Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511.ORCID 0000-0003-1996-2173
Andra M RudziteDepartment of Neurobiology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708.
Mahmood S HoseiniDepartment of Physiology, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143.ORCID 0000-0002-3139-0561
Mishek ThapaDepartment of Neurobiology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708.
Michael P StrykerDepartment of Physiology, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143.ORCID 0000-0003-1546-5831
Greg D FieldDepartment of Neurobiology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708.
Steven W ZuckerDepartment of Computer Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511.ORCID 0000-0002-2205-6895

Funding

DEVELOPMENT &PLASTICITY OF THE VISUAL SYSTEMR01EY002874 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI STRYKER, MICHAEL P · 1986 to 2022
$6.4M
Elucidating Novel Features of Visual Processing and Physiological Connectivity from Retina to Primary Visual CortexR01EY031059 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Gregory Darin Field, Alexander C Huk · 2020 to 2026
$4.7M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY002874NEI NIH HHS R01 EY031059
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The retina and primary visual cortex (V1) both exhibit diverse neural populations sensitive to diverse visual features. Yet it remains unclear how neural populations in each area partition stimulus space to span these features. One possibility is that neural populations are organized into discrete groups of neurons, with each group signaling a particular constellation of features. Alternatively, neurons could be continuously distributed across feature-encoding space. To distinguish these possibilities, we presented a battery of visual stimuli to the mouse retina and V1 while measuring neural responses with multi-electrode arrays. Using machine learning approaches, we developed a manifold embedding technique that captures how neural populations partition feature space and how visual responses correlate with physiological and anatomical properties of individual neurons. We show that retinal populations discretely encode features, while V1 populations provide a more continuous representation. Applying the same analysis approach to convolutional neural networks that model visual processing, we demonstrate that they partition features much more similarly to the retina, indicating they are more like big retinas than little brains.

Indexed as

Visual CortexAnimalsMiceNeural Networks, ComputerNeuronsPhotic StimulationRetinaVisual Perceptioncomputational neurosciencedeep networksencoding manifoldretinavisual cortex

Identifiers

PMID38227668
PMCPMC10823231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.