ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2024
A Systematic Comparison of Normal Structure and Function of the Greater Thoracic Vessels.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mechanics and mechanobiology of arterial development.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2026Review
- Postnatal pulmonary artery development from transcript to tissue.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2026Article
- Experimental Protocols to Test Aortic Soft Tissues: A Systematic Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Hemodynamics and Wall Mechanics of Vascular Graft Failure.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The greater thoracic vessels are central to a well-functioning circulatory system and are often targeted in congenital heart surgeries, yet the structure and function of these vessels have not been well studied. Here we use consistent methods to quantify and compare microstructural features and biaxial biomechanical properties of the following six greater thoracic vessels in wild-type mice: ascending thoracic aorta, descending thoracic aorta, right subclavian artery, right pulmonary artery, thoracic inferior vena cava, and superior vena cava. Specifically, we determine volume fractions and orientations of the structurally significant wall constituents (i.e., collagen, elastin, and cell nuclei) using multiphoton imaging, and we quantify vasoactive responses and mechanobiologically relevant mechanical quantities (e.g., stress, stiffness) using computer-controlled biaxial mechanical testing. Similarities and differences across systemic, pulmonary, and venous circulations highlight underlying design principles of the vascular system. Results from this study represent another step towards understanding growth and remodeling of greater thoracic vessels in health, disease, and surgical interventions by providing baseline information essential for developing and validating predictive computational models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.