ArticleActa neurochirurgica2024
Comparison of IMD and ICG videoangiography in combined bypass surgery: a single-center study.
Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSuperficial temporal artery-middle cerebral artery (STA-MCA) bypass combined with an encephaloduromyosynangiosis (EDMS) had gained significant role in treating chronic cerebral ischemia. Invasiveness and costs of intraoperative digital subtraction angiography (DSA) limited its application in operations.
objectiveTo find the reliable parameters for determining bypass patency with intraoperative micro-Doppler (IMD) sonography and compare the diagnostic accuracy of indocyanine green (ICG) videoangiography with IMD in combined bypass.
methodOne hundred fifty bypass procedures were included and divided into patent and non-patent groups according to postoperative computed tomography angiography (CTA) within 72 h. The surgical process was divided into four phases in the following order: preparation phase (phase 1), anastomosis phase (phase 2), the temporalis muscle closure phase (phase 3), and the bone flap closure phase (phase 4). The IMD parameters were compared between patent and non-patent groups, and then compared with the patency on CTA by statistical analyses. IMD with CTA, ICG videoangiography with CTA, IMD with ICG videoangiography were performed to assess bypass patency. The agreement between methods was evaluated using kappa statistics.
resultsNo significant differences of baseline characteristics were found between patent and non-patent group. Parameters in the STA were different between patent and non-patent groups in phases 2, 3, and 4. In patent group, Vm was apparently higher and PI was lower in phases 2, 3, and 4 compared with phase 1 (P < .001). In non-patent group, no differences of Vm and PI were found within inter-group. The best cutoff value of IMD in the STA to distinguish patent from non-patent bypasses was Vm in phase 4 > 17.5 cm/s (sensitivity 94.2%, specificity 100%). In addition, the agreement for accessing bypass patency was moderate between ICG videoangiography and CTA (kappa = 0.67), IMD and ICG videoangiography (kappa = 0.73), and good between IMD and CTA (kappa = 0.86).
conclusionICG videoangiography could directly display morphology changes of bypass. IMD could be used for providing half-quantitative parameters to assess bypass patency. Vm in phase 4 > 17.5 cm/s suggesting the patency of bypass on CTA would be good. Also, compared with ICG videoangiography, IMD had more accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.