Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38227032›Full record

Trial reportJAMA2024

Default Palliative Care Consultation for Seriously Ill Hospitalized Patients: A Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Trial.

Katherine R Courtright, Vanessa Madden, Brian Bayes, Marzana Chowdhury, Casey Whitman, Dylan S Small, Michael O Harhay, Suzanne Parra, Elizabeth Cooney-Zingman, Mary Ersek and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyPragmatic Clinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02505035 (Default Palliative Care Consultation for Seriously Ill Hospitalized Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
20.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02505035 nacompletednot on this map

Default Palliative Care Consultation for Seriously Ill Hospitalized Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PennsylvaniaRan2016 to 2020Enrolled34,239ConditionsCOPD, ESRD, DementiaArmsDefault ordering of palliative consult
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Katherine R CourtrightPerelman School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Vanessa MaddenPalliative and Advanced Illness Research (PAIR) Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Brian BayesPalliative and Advanced Illness Research (PAIR) Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Marzana ChowdhuryPalliative and Advanced Illness Research (PAIR) Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Casey WhitmanPalliative and Advanced Illness Research (PAIR) Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Dylan S SmallDepartment of Statistics, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Michael O HarhayPalliative and Advanced Illness Research (PAIR) Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Suzanne ParraAscension, St Louis, Missouri.
Elizabeth Cooney-ZingmanPalliative and Advanced Illness Research (PAIR) Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Mary ErsekLeonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Gabriel J EscobarDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.
Sarah H HillCHRISTUS Santa Rosa, San Antonio, Texas.
Scott D HalpernPerelman School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
University of Pennsylvania · USAscension · USChristus Santa Rosa Health System · USKaiser Permanente · US

Funding

Determinants of Specialist Palliative Care Provision for Patients with ADRDUH3AG050311 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI HALPERN, SCOTT D · 2015 to 2018
$2.9M
NIA NIH HHS UH3 AG050311
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Increasing inpatient palliative care delivery is prioritized, but large-scale, experimental evidence of its effectiveness is lacking. Objective: To determine whether ordering palliative care consultation by default for seriously ill hospitalized patients without requiring greater palliative care staffing increased consultations and improved outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: A pragmatic, stepped-wedge, cluster randomized trial was conducted among patients 65 years or older with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dementia, or kidney failure admitted from March 21, 2016, through November 14, 2018, to 11 US hospitals. Outcome data collection ended on January 31, 2019. Intervention: Ordering palliative care consultation by default for eligible patients, while allowing clinicians to opt-out, was compared with usual care, in which clinicians could choose to order palliative care. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was hospital length of stay, with deaths coded as the longest length of stay, and secondary end points included palliative care consult rate, discharge to hospice, do-not-resuscitate orders, and in-hospital mortality. Results: Of 34 239 patients enrolled, 24 065 had lengths of stay of at least 72 hours and were included in the primary analytic sample (10 313 in the default order group and 13 752 in the usual care group; 13 338 [55.4%] women; mean age, 77.9 years). A higher percentage of patients in the default order group received palliative care consultation than in the standard care group (43.9% vs 16.6%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 5.17 [95% CI, 4.59-5.81]) and received consultation earlier (mean [SD] of 3.4 [2.6] days after admission vs 4.6 [4.8] days; P < .001). Length of stay did not differ between the default order and usual care groups (percent difference in median length of stay, -0.53% [95% CI, -3.51% to 2.53%]). Patients in the default order group had higher rates of do-not-resuscitate orders at discharge (aOR, 1.40 [95% CI, 1.21-1.63]) and discharge to hospice (aOR, 1.30 [95% CI, 1.07-1.57]) than the usual care group, and similar in-hospital mortality (4.7% vs 4.2%; aOR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.68-1.08]). Conclusions and Relevance: Default palliative care consult orders did not reduce length of stay for older, hospitalized patients with advanced chronic illnesses, but did improve the rate and timing of consultation and some end-of-life care processes. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02505035.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessPalliative CareReferral and ConsultationAgedDementiaFemaleHospicesHospitalizationHospital MortalityHumansMalePulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveRenal Insufficiency

Identifiers

PMID38227032
PMCPMC10792472
OpenAlexW4390919032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.