ArticleJAMA2024
Analysis of Breast Cancer Mortality in the US-1975 to 2019.
Article in JAMA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 161 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
161 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 244 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of hypofractionated versus conventional radiotherapy in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Reproductive outcomes of pregnancy after breast cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Screening for breast cancer: a systematic review update to inform the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care guideline.Systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Direct and Indirect Costs of Breast Cancer and Associated Implications: A Systematic Review.Advances in therapy · 2024Pooled it
- Trial
- Guiding Risk Reduction for Breast Cancer-Relevant Chemicals (BC-Chems): Chemical Production Volumes, Sources, Intake Levels, Emissions, and Regulations.Environmental health perspectives · 2026Article
- Cancer Among Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders, 1999-2020.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026Article
- Early post-operative changes in quality of life and psychological symptoms after breast cancer surgery: the role of perceived pain, upper limb disability, and disease acceptance.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Observational
- Geographic access to triple negative breast cancer clinical trials: are trials located near patients?Breast cancer research and treatment · 2026Article
- Article
- Mapping the landscape of Chinese patent medicines in breast cancer: a multi-database bibliometric analysis (1991-2025).Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Ten-year survival of women with invasive breast cancer by stage, molecular subtype, and grade combined: a population-based study.The oncologist · 2026Article
- Feasibility and trade-offs of incorporating cardiac substructure dose constraints in left-sided breast volumetric modulated arc therapy planning.Radiation oncology journal · 2026Article
- Current and future therapies for triple-negative breast cancer.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2026Review
- Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of novel trifluoromethyl-substituted quinolinone derivatives targeting triple-negative breast cancer.Molecular diversity · 2026Article
- Trends in heart failure-related mortality among breast cancer patients in the United States from 1999 to 2024.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Article
- Review
- Extracellular vesicles in nipple discharge for breast cancer screening.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2026Article
- Non-receptor tyrosine kinase signaling pathways and therapeutic implications.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Review
- International trends in cancer mortality revisited: Japan's site-specific progress and remaining challenges until 2024.Japanese journal of clinical oncology · 2026Article
101 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
19 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Breast cancer mortality in the US declined between 1975 and 2019. The association of changes in metastatic breast cancer treatment with improved breast cancer mortality is unclear. Objective: To simulate the relative associations of breast cancer screening, treatment of stage I to III breast cancer, and treatment of metastatic breast cancer with improved breast cancer mortality. Design, Setting, and Participants: Using aggregated observational and clinical trial data on the dissemination and effects of screening and treatment, 4 Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET) models simulated US breast cancer mortality rates. Death due to breast cancer, overall and by estrogen receptor and ERBB2 (formerly HER2) status, among women aged 30 to 79 years in the US from 1975 to 2019 was simulated. Exposures: Screening mammography, treatment of stage I to III breast cancer, and treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Main Outcomes and Measures: Model-estimated age-adjusted breast cancer mortality rate associated with screening, stage I to III treatment, and metastatic treatment relative to the absence of these exposures was assessed, as was model-estimated median survival after breast cancer metastatic recurrence. Results: The breast cancer mortality rate in the US (age adjusted) was 48/100 000 women in 1975 and 27/100 000 women in 2019. In 2019, the combination of screening, stage I to III treatment, and metastatic treatment was associated with a 58% reduction (model range, 55%-61%) in breast cancer mortality. Of this reduction, 29% (model range, 19%-33%) was associated with treatment of metastatic breast cancer, 47% (model range, 35%-60%) with treatment of stage I to III breast cancer, and 25% (model range, 21%-33%) with mammography screening. Based on simulations, the greatest change in survival after metastatic recurrence occurred between 2000 and 2019, from 1.9 years (model range, 1.0-2.7 years) to 3.2 years (model range, 2.0-4.9 years). Median survival for estrogen receptor (ER)-positive/ERBB2-positive breast cancer improved by 2.5 years (model range, 2.0-3.4 years), whereas median survival for ER-/ERBB2- breast cancer improved by 0.5 years (model range, 0.3-0.8 years). Conclusions and Relevance: According to 4 simulation models, breast cancer screening and treatment in 2019 were associated with a 58% reduction in US breast cancer mortality compared with interventions in 1975. Simulations suggested that treatment for stage I to III breast cancer was associated with approximately 47% of the mortality reduction, whereas treatment for metastatic breast cancer was associated with 29% of the reduction and screening with 25% of the reduction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.