Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38227005›Full record

ReviewJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology2024

Model organisms and systems in neuroethology: one hundred years of history and a look into the future.

Hermann Wagner, Martin Egelhaaf, Catherine Carr

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. A perspective on neuroethology: what the past teaches us about the future of neuroethology.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Hermann WagnerInstitute of Biology II, RWTH Aachen University, 52074, Aachen, Germany. wagner@bio2.rwth-aachen.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8191-7595
Martin EgelhaafDepartment of Neurobiology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Catherine CarrDepartment of Biology, University of Maryland at College Park, College Park, USA.
Bielefeld University · DERWTH Aachen University · DEUniversity of Maryland, College Park · US

Funding

Development of Temporal Fine structureR01DC019341 · NIDCD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI CARR, CATHERINE EMILY · 2021 to 2025
$1.6M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC019341
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Journal of Comparative Physiology lived up to its name in the last 100 years by including more than 1500 different taxa in almost 10,000 publications. Seventeen phyla of the animal kingdom were represented. The honeybee (Apis mellifera) is the taxon with most publications, followed by locust (Locusta migratoria), crayfishes (Cambarus spp.), and fruitfly (Drosophila melanogaster). The representation of species in this journal in the past, thus, differs much from the 13 model systems as named by the National Institutes of Health (USA). We mention major accomplishments of research on species with specific adaptations, specialist animals, for example, the quantitative description of the processes underlying the axon potential in squid (Loligo forbesii) and the isolation of the first receptor channel in the electric eel (Electrophorus electricus) and electric ray (Torpedo spp.). Future neuroethological work should make the recent genetic and technological developments available for specialist animals. There are many research questions left that may be answered with high yield in specialists and some questions that can only be answered in specialists. Moreover, the adaptations of animals that occupy specific ecological niches often lend themselves to biomimetic applications. We go into some depth in explaining our thoughts in the research of motion vision in insects, sound localization in barn owls, and electroreception in weakly electric fish.

Indexed as

Electric FishSound LocalizationStrigiformesAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterElectrophorusVision, OcularBarn owlElectric fishElectrolocationFlyMotion visionSound localization

Identifiers

PMID38227005
PMCPMC10995084
OpenAlexW4390918512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.