Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38226860›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2024

Thermodynamics of Metal-Acetate Interactions.

Majid Jafari, Zhen Li, Lin Frank Song, Luca Sagresti, Giuseppe Brancato, Kenneth M Merz

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Recent Developments in Amber Biomolecular Simulations.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Simulating Metal-Imidazole Complexes.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024
    Article
  12. Binding of Phosphate Species to CaJournal of chemical theory and computation · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Majid JafariDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5233-6882
Zhen LiDepartment of Chemistry, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, United States.
Lin Frank SongBiochemical and Biophysical Systems Group, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1854-5215
Luca SagrestiScuola Normale Superiore and CSGI, Piazza dei Cavalieri 7, I-56126 Pisa, Italy.
Giuseppe BrancatoScuola Normale Superiore and CSGI, Piazza dei Cavalieri 7, I-56126 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8059-2517
Kenneth M MerzDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9139-5893
Michigan State University · USScuola Normale Superiore · ITLawrence Livermore National Laboratory · US

Funding

Modeling Transition Metal Ion Binding to ProteinsR01GM130641 · NIGMS · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KENNETH M. MERZ · 2019 to 2026
$2.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM130641
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metal ions play crucial roles in protein- and ligand-mediated interactions. They not only act as catalysts to facilitate biological processes but are also important as protein structural elements. Accurately predicting metal ion interactions in computational studies has always been a challenge, and various methods have been suggested to improve these interactions. One such method is the 12-6-4 Lennard-Jones (LJ)-type nonbonded model. Using this model, it has been possible to successfully reproduce the experimental properties of metal ions in aqueous solution. The model includes induced dipole interactions typically ignored in the standard 12-6 LJ nonbonded model. In this we expand the applicability of this model to metal ion-carboxylate interactions. Using 12-6-4 parameters that reproduce the solvation free energies of the metal ions leads to an overestimation of metal ion-acetate interactions, thus, prompting us to fine-tune the model to specifically handle the latter. We also show that the standard 12-6 LJ model significantly falls short in reproducing the experimental binding free energy between acetate and 11 metal ions (Ni(II), Mg(II), Cu(II), Zn(II), Co(II), Cu(I), Fe(II), Mn(II), Cd(II), Ca(II), and Ag(I)). In this study, we describe optimized C

Identifiers

PMID38226860
PMCPMC12203879
OpenAlexW4390919652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.