Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38226690›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2024

The Delaware-Oslo ACL Cohort treatment algorithm yields superior outcomes to usual care 9-12 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Anouk P Urhausen, Hege Grindem, Lars Engebretsen, Karin Grävare Silbernagel, Michael J Axe, Lynn Snyder-Mackler, May Arna Risberg

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Which patients need anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction after initial treatment with rehabilitation? A scoping review.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Anouk P UrhausenDepartment of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4409-1501
Hege GrindemOslo Sport Trauma Research Center, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2121-0827
Lars EngebretsenOslo Sport Trauma Research Center, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2294-921X
Karin Grävare SilbernagelDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7566-407X
Michael J AxeDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9541-1843
Lynn Snyder-MacklerDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1767-7910
May Arna RisbergDepartment of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9511-1314
University of Delaware · USOslo University Hospital · NONorwegian School of Sport Sciences · NOOslo Sports Trauma Research Center · NO

Funding

Dynamic Stability in the ACL Injured KneeR37HD037985 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI GRAVARE SILBERNAGEL, KARIN M E · 2012 to 2021
$4.2M
NICHD NIH HHS R37 HD037985NIH HHS R37HD037985
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePatient-reported outcomes were compared between participants who followed the treatment algorithm of the Delaware-Oslo ACL Cohort, consisting of progressive preoperative and postoperative rehabilitation, patient education, clinical testing and shared decision-making about treatment choice, and those who followed usual care 9-12 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).

methodsParticipants with primary ACLR were included from the Norwegian arm of the Delaware-Oslo ACL Cohort and the Norwegian Knee Ligament Registry (usual care). The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscale scores and the International Knee Documentation Committee-Subjective Knee Form (IKDC-SKF) scores were compared. KOOS scores for the usual care group were converted to IKDC-SKF scores with recently published validated crosswalk. The percentages of participants with scores above predefined thresholds for patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) were also calculated.

resultsEighty of 100 (80%) participants from the Delaware-Oslo ACL Cohort and 1588 of 3248 (49%) from the usual care group participated in the follow-up. Participants from the Delaware-Oslo ACL Cohort had higher KOOS subscale (p < 0.001) and IKDC-SKF scores (p < 0.001), and a higher percentage reached PASS (84%-96% vs. 62%-76%, p ≤ 0.002) for KOOS Pain, symptoms, activities of daily living and sports compared to the usual care group. No significant differences were found for KOOS quality of life scores (not significant [n.s.]) or PASS percentages (80% vs. 74%, n.s.).

conclusionParticipants with ACLR who followed the Delaware-Oslo ACL Cohort treatment algorithm had reduced knee symptoms, superior function and higher percentages of satisfactory outcomes than participants who followed usual care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionActivities of Daily LivingDelawareHumansQuality of LifeACL reconstructionpatient acceptable symptom statepatient-reported outcomesrehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID38226690
PMCPMC11291834
OpenAlexW4390858356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.