Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38226666›Full record

ArticleAdvanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.)2024

3D Niche-Inspired Scaffolds as a Stem Cell Delivery System for the Regeneration of the Osteochondral Interface.

Sandra Camarero-Espinosa, Ivo Beeren, Hong Liu, David B Gomes, Jip Zonderland, Ana Filipa H Lourenço, Denis van Beurden, Marloes Peters, David Koper, Pieter Emans and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Sandra Camarero-EspinosaMERLN Institute for Technology-inspired Regenerative Medicine, Complex Tissue Regeneration Department, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Ivo BeerenMERLN Institute for Technology-inspired Regenerative Medicine, Complex Tissue Regeneration Department, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Hong LiuMERLN Institute for Technology-inspired Regenerative Medicine, Complex Tissue Regeneration Department, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
David B GomesMERLN Institute for Technology-inspired Regenerative Medicine, Complex Tissue Regeneration Department, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Jip ZonderlandMERLN Institute for Technology-inspired Regenerative Medicine, Complex Tissue Regeneration Department, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Ana Filipa H LourençoMERLN Institute for Technology-inspired Regenerative Medicine, Complex Tissue Regeneration Department, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Denis van BeurdenMERLN Institute for Technology-inspired Regenerative Medicine, Complex Tissue Regeneration Department, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Marloes PetersMERLN Institute for Technology-inspired Regenerative Medicine, Complex Tissue Regeneration Department, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
David KoperMERLN Institute for Technology-inspired Regenerative Medicine, Complex Tissue Regeneration Department, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Pieter EmansDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Peter KesslerDepartment of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, PO Box 5800, Maastricht, 6202, The Netherlands.
Timo RademakersMERLN Institute for Technology-inspired Regenerative Medicine, Complex Tissue Regeneration Department, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Matthew B BakerMERLN Institute for Technology-inspired Regenerative Medicine, Complex Tissue Regeneration Department, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Nicole BouvyDepartment of General Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 616, 6200MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Lorenzo MoroniMERLN Institute for Technology-inspired Regenerative Medicine, Complex Tissue Regeneration Department, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1298-6025

Funding

Basque Government PIBA_2022_1_0006Cell Hybridge 637308European Research CouncilSpanish Ministry of Science and InnovationState Investigation Agency PID2020-114901RA-I00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The regeneration of the osteochondral unit represents a challenge due to the distinct cartilage and bone phases. Current strategies focus on the development of multiphasic scaffolds that recapitulate features of this complex unit and promote the differentiation of implanted bone-marrow derived stem cells (BMSCs). In doing so, challenges remain from the loss of stemness during in vitro expansion of the cells and the low control over stem cell activity at the interface with scaffolds in vitro and in vivo. Here, this work scaffolds inspired by the bone marrow niche that can recapitulate the natural healing process after injury. The construct comprises an internal depot of quiescent BMSCs, mimicking the bone marrow cavity, and an electrospun (ESP) capsule that "activates" the cells to migrate into an outer "differentiation-inducing" 3D printed unit functionalized with TGF-β and BMP-2 peptides. In vitro, niche-inspired scaffolds retained a depot of nonproliferative cells capable of migrating and proliferating through the ESP capsule. Invasion of the 3D printed cavity results in location-specific cell differentiation, mineralization, secretion of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and glycosaminoglycans (GAGs), and genetic upregulation of collagen II and collagen I. In vivo, niche-inspired scaffolds are biocompatible, promoted tissue formation in rat subcutaneous models, and regeneration of the osteochondral unit in rabbit models.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationPrinting, Three-DimensionalTissue ScaffoldsAnimalsBone Morphogenetic Protein 2Bone RegenerationChondrogenesisHumansMesenchymal Stem CellsOsteogenesisRabbitsRatsRegenerationTissue EngineeringTransforming Growth Factor betaBone Morphogenetic Protein 2Transforming Growth Factor betaadditive manufacturingelectrospinninghydrogelsregenerative medicinestem cells

Identifiers

PMID38226666
PMCPMC7619216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.