Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38226640›Full record

ReviewClinical microbiology reviews2024

Eloise Williams, Kate L Seib, Christopher K Fairley, Georgina L Pollock, Jane S Hocking, James S McCarthy, Deborah A Williamson

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical microbiology reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
16.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Frontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Eloise WilliamsDepartment of Infectious Diseases, The University of Melbourne at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5654-896X
Kate L SeibInstitute for Glycomics, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7094-3528
Christopher K FairleyMelbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Georgina L PollockDepartment of Infectious Diseases, The University of Melbourne at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jane S HockingCentre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
James S McCarthyDepartment of Infectious Diseases, The University of Melbourne at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6596-9718
Deborah A WilliamsonDepartment of Infectious Diseases, The University of Melbourne at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7363-6665
The University of Melbourne · AUGriffith University · AUMelbourne Sexual Health Centre · AUThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AU

Funding

DHAC | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) GNT1172900DHAC | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) GNT2005380DHAC | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) GNT2016396DHAC | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) GNT2017383Medical Research Future Fund MRFAR000354National Health and Medical Research Council GNT1174555
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsGonorrheaVaccinesHumansInfant, NewbornNeisseria gonorrhoeaeAnti-Infective AgentsVaccinescontrolled human infection modelNeisseria gonorrhoeaeNeisseria meningitidispublic healthsexually transmitted diseasesvaccines

Identifiers

PMID38226640
PMCPMC10938898
OpenAlexW4390911077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.