Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38226523›Full record

ArticleMicroscopy (Oxford, England)2024

Three-dimensional nanostructure analysis of non-stained Nafion in fuel-cell electrode by combined ADF-STEM tomography.

Takuji Ube

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microscopy (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Takuji UbeNano-scale Characterization Center, JFE Techno-Research Corporation, Kawasaki-Ku, Kawasaki City, Kanagawa, Tokyo 2100855, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9786-7035
JFE Holdings (Japan) · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The polymer electrolyte fuel cell (PEFC) is one of the strongest candidates for a next-generation power source for vehicles which do not emit CO2 gas as exhaust gas. The key factor in PEFCs is the nano-scaled electrochemical reactions that take place on the catalyst material and an ionomer supported by a carbon support. However, because the nano-scaled morphological features of the key materials in the catalyst compound cannot be observed clearly by transmission electron microscopy, improvement of PEFC performance had been approached by an imaginal schematic diagram based on an electrochemical analysis. In this study, we revealed the nano-scaled morphological features of the PEFC electrode in three dimensions and performed a quantitative analysis of the nanostructure by the newly developed 'Combined ADF-STEM tomography technique'. This method combines information from plural annular darkfield detectors with different electron collection angles and can emphasize the difference of the electron scattering intensity between the ionomer and carbon in the cross-sectional image of the reconstructed three-dimensional (3D) data. Therefore, this segmentation method utilizing image contrast does not require a high electron beam current like that used in energy dispersive X-ray analysis, and thus is suitable for electron beam damage-sensitive materials. By eliminating the process of manually determining the thresholds for obtaining classified component data from grayscale data, the obtained 3D structures have sufficient accuracy to allow quantitative analysis and specify the nano-scaled structural parameters directly related to power generation characteristics.

Indexed as

3DionomerPEFCsegmentationSTEMtomography

Identifiers

PMID38226523
PMCPMC11288185
OpenAlexW4390913149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.