ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2024
Comparing Cognitive Tests and Smartphone-Based Assessment in 2 US Community-Based Cohorts.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cognitive Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery From 2005 to 2025: A Systematic Review.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Pooled it
- Circulating Sphingomyelins Correlate With Plasma T-Tau in Cognitively Unimpaired Older Adults at Risk of Developing Alzheimer's Disease.Journal of neurochemistry · 2026Article
- Feasibility and utility of a tablet-based digital neurocognitive assessment following radiosurgery for brain metastases.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Associations Between Smartphone-Based Finger Tapping and Cognitive Performance in Older Adults: Observational Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Observational
- Practice effects on digital cognitive assessment tools: insights from the defense automated neurobehavioral assessment battery.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Article
- Integrating a novel tablet-based digital neurocognitive assessment tool in brain metastases patients.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Observational
- The Validity of a Smartphone-Based Application for Assessing Cognitive Function in the Elderly.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Digital Screening for Early Identification of Cognitive Impairment: A Narrative Review.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive scienceReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSmartphone-based cognitive assessments have emerged as promising tools, bridging gaps in accessibility and reducing bias in Alzheimer disease and related dementia research. However, their congruence with traditional neuropsychological tests and usefulness in diverse cohorts remain underexplored. METHODS AND
resultsA total of 406 FHS (Framingham Heart Study) and 59 BHS (Bogalusa Heart Study) participants with traditional neuropsychological tests and digital assessments using the Defense Automated Neurocognitive Assessment (DANA) smartphone protocol were included. Regression models investigated associations between DANA task digital measures and a neuropsychological global cognitive
conclusionsOur findings demonstrate that smartphone-based cognitive assessments exhibit concurrent validity with a composite measure of traditional neuropsychological tests. This supports the potential of using smartphone-based assessments in cognitive screening across diverse populations and the scalability of digital assessments to community-dwelling individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.