Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38226513›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2024

Quantifying Induced Nystagmus Using a Smartphone Eye Tracking Application (EyePhone).

Pouya B Bastani, Hector Rieiro, Shervin Badihian, Jorge Otero-Millan, Nathan Farrell, Max Parker, David Newman-Toker, Yuxin Zhu, Ali Saber Tehrani

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Acute vertigo: stroke or not?Current opinion in neurology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Pouya B BastaniDepartment of Neurology Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore MD USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5884-2126
Hector RieiroDepartment of Neurology Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore MD USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4312-9432
Shervin BadihianArmstrong Institute Center for Diagnostic Excellence Baltimore MD USA.
Jorge Otero-MillanHerbert Wertheim School of Optometry and Vision Science University of California Berkeley CA USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9789-8392
Nathan FarrellDepartment of Neurology Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore MD USA.
Max ParkerDepartment of Neurology, NYU Langone Health New York NY USA.
David Newman-TokerDepartment of Neurology Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore MD USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2789-4115
Yuxin ZhuDepartment of Neurology Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore MD USA.
Ali Saber TehraniDepartment of Neurology Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore MD USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4563-4018
Johns Hopkins University · USCleveland Clinic · USNYU Langone Health · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are ≈5 million annual dizziness visits to US emergency departments, of which vestibular strokes account for over 250 000. The head impulse, nystagmus, and test of skew eye examination can accurately distinguish vestibular strokes from peripheral dizziness. However, the eye-movement signs are subtle, and lack of familiarity and difficulty with recognition of abnormal eye movements are significant barriers to widespread emergency department use. To break this barrier, we sought to assess the accuracy of EyePhone, our smartphone eye-tracking application, for quantifying nystagmus. METHODS AND

resultsWe prospectively enrolled healthy volunteers and recorded the velocity of induced nystagmus using a smartphone eye-tracking application (EyePhone) and then compared the results with video oculography (VOG). Following a calibration protocol, the participants viewed optokinetic stimuli with incremental velocities (2-12 degrees/s) in 4 directions. We extracted slow phase velocities from EyePhone data in each direction and compared them with the corresponding slow phase velocities obtained by the VOG. Furthermore, we calculated the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for nystagmus detection by EyePhone. We enrolled 10 volunteers (90% men) with an average age of 30.2±6 years. EyePhone-recorded slow phase velocities highly correlated with the VOG recordings (r=0.98 for horizontal and r=0.94 for vertical). The calibration significantly increased the slope of linear regression for horizontal and vertical slow phase velocities. Evaluating the EyePhone's performance using VOG data with a 2 degrees/s threshold showed an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.87 for horizontal and vertical nystagmus detection.

conclusionsWe demonstrated that EyePhone could accurately detect and quantify optokinetic nystagmus, similar to the VOG goggles.

Indexed as

Nystagmus, PathologicStrokeAdultDizzinessEye MovementsEye-Tracking TechnologyFemaleHumansMaleSmartphoneYoung Adulteye movementshealth technologyHINTSnystagmusvestibular strokes

Identifiers

PMID38226513
PMCPMC10926800
OpenAlexW4390914531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.