ArticleEnvironmental health perspectives2024
Comparison of
Article in Environmental health perspectives, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Social determinants of health across the lifecourse and chronic disease risk: available data and seminal findings from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study.American journal of epidemiology · 2026Review
- 2-aminobutyrate mediates the impact of air pollution on blood biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- Using low-cost sensors and GPS to assess spatiotemporal variations in personal exposure to PMEnvironmental research · 2025Article
- Association of midlife air pollution and road proximity exposure with 29-year cognitive decline.Neurotoxicology · 2025Article
- Metabolomic evaluation of air pollution-related bone damage and potential mediation in Women's Health Initiative participants.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2025Article
- Hypothetical Behavioral Interventions for Mitigating the Cardiovascular Effects of Long-Term Fine Particulate Matter Exposure: Analyses From 2 Prospective Cohorts.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Fine particulate matter and nonaccidental and cause-specific mortality: Do associations vary by exposure assessment method?Environmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMany approaches to quantifying air pollution exposures have been developed. However, the impact of choice of approach on air pollution estimates and health-effects associations remains unclear.
objectivesOur objective is to compare particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter
methodsWe assigned annual
resultsWith a few exceptions, relative agreement of approach-specific
conclusionsDifferent estimation approaches produced similar spatial patterns of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.