Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38226335›Full record

ArticleBone reports2024

Risk prediction of second hip fracture by bone and muscle density of the hip varies with time after first hip fracture: A prospective cohort study.

Ling Wang, Minghui Yang, Yufeng Ge, Yandong Liu, Gang Wang, Yongbin Su, Zhe Guo, Lu Yin, Pengju Huang, Jian Geng and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Secondary fracture risk after hip fracture in older patients: an updated sex-specific systematic review and meta analysis with GRADE and PAF assessment.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 10 institutions in 5 countries.

Ling WangDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100035, China.
Minghui YangDepartments of Traumatic Orthopedics, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yufeng GeDepartments of Traumatic Orthopedics, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yandong LiuDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100035, China.
Gang WangDepartment of Radiology, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Yongbin SuDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100035, China.
Zhe GuoDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100035, China.
Lu YinInformation Center, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Fuwai Hospital, Beijing 100037, China.
Pengju HuangDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100035, China.
Jian GengDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100035, China.
Glen M BlakeSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Bo HeDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Shiwen ZhuDepartments of Traumatic Orthopedics, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xiaoguang ChengDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100035, China.
Xinbao WuDepartments of Traumatic Orthopedics, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Hannu T AroDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Annegreet VlugCenter for Bone Quality, Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Klaus EngelkeDepartment of Medicine 3, FAU University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Beijing Jishuitan Hospital · CNCapital Medical University · CNPeking University · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNFirst People's Hospital of Yunnan Province · CNKunming Medical University · CNLeiden University Medical Center · NLSt Thomas' Hospital · GBUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen · DEUniversity of Turku · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Predictors of 'imminent' risk of second hip fracture are unknown. The aims of the study were to explore strength of hip areal bone mineral density (aBMD), and muscle area and density for predicting second hip fracture at different time intervals. Methods: Data of the Chinese Second Hip Fracture Evaluation were analyzed, a longitudinal study to evaluate the risk of second hip fracture (of the contralateral hip) by using CT images obtained immediately after first hip fracture. Muscle cross-sectional area and density were measured of the gluteus maximus (G.MaxM) and gluteus medius and minimus (G.Med/MinM) and aBMD of the proximal femur at the contralateral unfractured side. Patients were followed up for a median time of 4.5 years. Separate Cox models were used to predict second hip fracture risk at different time intervals after first event adjusted for age, sex, BMI and diabetes. Results: The mean age of subjects with imminent (within 1st or 2nd year) second hip fracture was 79.80 ± 5.16 and 81.56 ± 3.64 years. In the 1st year after the first hip fracture, femoral neck (FN) aBMD predicted second hip fracture (HR 5.88; 95 % CI, 1.32-26.09). In the remaining years of follow-up after 2nd year, muscle density predicted second hip fracture (G.MaxM HR 2.13; 95 % CI, 1.25-3.65,G.Med/MinM HR 2.10; 95 % CI, 1.32-3.34). Conclusions: Our results show that femoral neck aBMD is an important predictor for second hip fracture within the first year and therefore suggest supports the importance concept of early and rapid-acting bone-active drugs to increase hip BMD. In addition, the importance of muscle density predicting second hip fracture after the second year suggest post hip fracture rehabilitation and exercise programs could also be important to reduce muscle fatty infiltration.

Indexed as

Bone mineral densityMuscle densityRisk predictorSecond hip fracture

Identifiers

PMID38226335
PMCPMC10788229
OpenAlexW4390095007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.