ArticleHeliyon2024
Association of perceived discrimination with the risk of depression among US older adults: A prospective population-based cohort study.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Discrimination and depressive symptoms: the role of psychological resilience across racial and ethnic groups.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2026Article
- Association between perceived discrimination and depressive symptoms among male and female mining workers in Chile: a sex-stratified analysis and the mediating role of psychological distress.BMC public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Association between perceived discrimination and depression has been demonstrated in some sources of discrimination, such as age, sex, and race. However, the effects of perceived discrimination both in any domain and each domain on development of depression are still unclear. We aimed to estimate the association of any and each domain of perceived discrimination with the risk of depression among US older adults. Methods: We did a population-based cohort study using eight waves (from 2006 to 2020) of data from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS), a nationally representative study of US older adults aged 51 years and above. Perceived discrimination was measured by the shortened 5-item version of Williams' discrimination scale, including five domains (less courtesy, service setting, not smart, threatened or harassed, and medical setting). Depressive symptoms were assessed with shortened 8-item version of the Center for Epidemiological Depression scale (8-item CES-D). Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the crude and adjusted hazards ratio (HRs) and their 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) between perceived discrimination and risk of depression, after controlling for potential confounders. Results: A total of 18502 participants were included in our final analyses. 42.8 % of them had any perceived discrimination at baseline, and the most prevalent perceived discrimination was feeling less courtesy, which was observed in 5893 people (31.6 %). During a median of 9.8 years follow-up, 44.7 % of participants developed depression. The risk of depression was 46 % (adjusted HR: 1.46, 95 % CI: 1.39-1.52) higher among people with perceived discrimination than those without. The associations between perceived discrimination in each domain and risk of depression were all prominent. Conclusions: Both any and each domain of perceived discrimination were associated with an increased risk of depression. Considering the high prevalence of perceived discrimination and the following poor health outcomes, our findings suggested the integrated measures of providing public education and diversified communication to reduce discrimination, as well as accessible emotional supports to prevent depression are urgently needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.