ArticleHeliyon2024
Analyzing robotic surgery impact on recovery quality & emotions.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Preoperative anxiety in patients undergoing minimally invasive thoracic surgery: A prospective study of predictors and Patient-Reported concerns.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Lobectomy for primary lung cancer: a comparison of perioperative and postoperative outcomes between robot-assisted thoracic surgery and video-assisted thoracic surgery.Surgery today · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The objective of this study is to investigate the postoperative recovery quality and emotional status of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who underwent robot-assisted and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery using the 15-item Quality of Recovery (QoR-15) scale and to analyze the correlation. Methods: We collected clinical data from 320 patients with NSCLC who underwent lobectomy using either robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) or video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) at our center from January 2021 to December 2022. We compared perioperative parameters and followed up after the operation using the QoR-15 scale to objectively assess the quality of postoperative recovery and physical and emotional status. Results: Apart from a notable distinction in anesthesia time, no significant differences were observed in other general data. Notably, the overall recovery rate for patients in the RATS group surpassed that of the VATS group (P < 0.05). Specifically, the recovery rates in the RATS group were significantly superior to those in the VATS group across nociceptive factors, emotional factors, activities of daily living, physiological factors, and cognitive ability (P < 0.05). Spearman correlation analysis between surgical methods and various indicators of the QoR-15 scale showed significant correlations between surgical methods ( Conclusion: The QoR-15 scale is a valuable tool for assessing the postoperative recovery quality in lung cancer patients. The RATS plays a significant role in promoting the swift postoperative recovery of patients and demonstrates excellent efficacy, safety, and reliability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.