ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2024
Establishment of an Evaluation Index System of Competencies for College Senior Students in General Practice Medicine in Anhui Province, China.
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Construction and validation of an evaluation index system for healthy villages in China: A human-AI synergistic approach integrating modified Delphi and AHP.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The competencies of college senior students in general practice medicine have attracted attention. This study aimed to construct an evaluation index system of competencies for college senior students in general practice medicine and to promote the reform and optimization of training programs for general medicine talent in colleges. Methods: The two-round Delphi method was used to determine the evaluation index system of competencies for college senior students in general practice medicine, and the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was used to calculate the weights of all levels of elements. Results: The evaluation index system of competencies for college senior students in general practice medicine was established with 3 primary factors, 9 secondary factors and 32 tertiary factors. The Delphi results revealed that the active coefficient of experts was 1 and the authority coefficient was 0.858. The 3 primary factors were knowledge level, job skills and professionalism with weights of 0.1532, 0.4207 and 0.4261, respectively. Among the secondary factors, the top three weight coefficients were professional ethics (0.2614), community practice (0.1526) and communication skills (0.1308). Among tertiary factors, "scientific research" exhibited the lowest value with a weight coefficient of 0.0049. Conclusion: In this study, we constructed an evaluation index system of competencies for college senior students in general practice medicine. The consensus on the content of the competencies of college senior students in general practice medicine suggests that these elements are necessary for those who will become general practitioners. This system can be used as the basis to evaluate the ability of college senior students in general practice medicine and provide guidance for the cultivation and evaluation of general medicine talent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.