ArticleiScience2024
Deep learning enhanced the diagnostic merit of serum glycome for multiple cancers.
Article in iScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Simultaneous ManNAc and Neu5Ac Quantification in Human Sera by LC-MS/MS.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Understanding glycan structure and function through artificial intelligence.BBA advances · 2026Review
- Machine-Learning-Based Prediction of Clinical Outcomes in Gliomas Using Glycomic Features.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protein glycosylation is associated with the pathogenesis of various cancers. The utilization of certain glycans in cancer diagnosis models holds promise, yet their accuracy is not always guaranteed. Here, we investigated the utility of deep learning techniques, specifically random forests combined with transfer learning, in enhancing serum glycome's discriminative power for cancer diagnosis (including ovarian cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, gastric cancer, and esophageal cancer). We started with ovarian cancer and demonstrated that transfer learning can achieve superior performance in data-disadvantaged cohorts (AUROC >0.9), outperforming the approach of PLS-DA. We identified a serum glycan-biomarker panel including 18 serum N-glycans and 4 glycan derived traits, most of which were featured with sialylation. Furthermore, we validated advantage of the transfer learning scheme across other cancer groups. These findings highlighted the superiority of transfer learning in improving the performance of glycans-based cancer diagnosis model and identifying cancer biomarkers, providing a new high-fidelity cancer diagnosis venue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.