ArticleCureus2023
Analyzing Mortality Patterns and Location of Death in Patients With Malignant Esophageal Neoplasms: A Two-Decade Study in the United States.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trends, patterns, and risk factors of esophageal cancer mortality in China, 2008-2021: A National Mortality Surveillance System data analysis.Journal of advanced research · 2026Article
- OncoMet: a deep learning framework for the prediction of oncogenic signaling pathways and metastasis in esophageal cancer patients using histopathology images from primary tumors.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Mortality from malignant neoplasms at home and in hospitals in Brazil, 2002-2022: sociodemographic characteristics and temporal trends.Revista brasileira de epidemiologia = Brazilian journal of epidemiology · 2025Article
- High serum uric acid levels are protective against cognitive impairment in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.Journal of neurology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Esophageal neoplasm carries significant implications for end-of-life care. Despite medical advancements, disparities in the location of death persist. Understanding the factors influencing the place of death for esophageal neoplasm patients is crucial for delivering patient-centered care. Objectives The primary objective of this study is to inspect and evaluate mortality patterns in patients with malignant esophageal neoplasms over the past two decades. Materials and methods Using the CDC-WONDER database, the authors analyzed 309,919 esophageal neoplasm-related deaths. Data was categorized by age, gender, race, and location of death, enabling a detailed examination of the factors influencing the place of death. Result This analysis revealed significant disparities in death locations. Age, gender, race, and geographic region all played substantial roles in determining where esophageal neoplasm patients spent their final moments. Notably, males consistently experienced higher mortality rates across all settings. Geographic disparities indicated varying mortality rates by census region, with the Southern region reporting the highest rates. Racial disparities were also evident, with white individuals having the highest number of deaths. Conclusion This study underscores the importance of recognizing and addressing disparities in the place of death among esophageal neoplasm patients in the United States. By shedding light on the demographic influences on end-of-life decisions, it paves the way for more targeted and patient-centered approaches to end-of-life care for this patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.