Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38225783›Full record

ArticleJournal of Korean medical science2024

Factors Affecting the Preference for Hospitals Over Clinics in Primary Care in Korea.

Agnus M Kim, Jin-Seok Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Korean medical science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Agnus M KimDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6616-2534
Jin-Seok LeeDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4329-0784

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile the effect of gatekeeping was extensively studied, few efforts have been made to explain why the measures to strengthen gatekeeping do not work well in some countries. This study examined the patient factors related to the choice of level of health care facilities for outpatient care in Korea.

methodsWe examined a population-based sample representative of the population of Korea aged 15 and over in the healthcare experience survey of 2021. A logistic regression model examined the factors associated with choosing hospitals or clinics for outpatient care.

resultsEasy accessibility, kindness of medical staff, and recommendations from acquaintances were considered more important for those who chose clinics over hospitals. While those who chose clinics were more likely to feel that physicians and nurses more readily communicated with patients, those who chose hospitals were more likely to feel that the facility was comfortable. Whereas those who chose hospitals were more likely to trust the current health care system in Korea, those who chose clinics were more likely to think that the health care system needed to be reformed. The tendency was similar when analyzed only among those with good perceived health conditions and without chronic diseases.

conclusionThis study demonstrates that the preference for hospitals over clinics is mainly based on desire rather than medical need and is not likely to be affected by measures intended to induce a voluntary change of behavior.

Indexed as

Health FacilitiesHospitalsHumansKoreaPrimary Health CareRepublic of KoreaGatekeepingHealth BehaviorHospitalsKoreaPrimary Health Care

Identifiers

PMID38225783
PMCPMC10789526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.