Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38225620›Full record

ArticleHuman resources for health2024

Engaging leadership and nurse well-being: the role of the work environment and work motivation-a cross-sectional study.

Dorothea Kohnen, Hans De Witte, Wilmar B Schaufeli, Simon Dello, Luk Bruyneel, Walter Sermeus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human resources for health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dorothea KohnenResearch Group Work, Organizational, and Personnel Psychology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. dorothea.kohnen@kuleuven.be.ORCID 0000-0002-7220-1819
Hans De WitteResearch Group Work, Organizational, and Personnel Psychology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-6691-517X
Wilmar B SchaufeliResearch Group Work, Organizational, and Personnel Psychology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-6070-7150
Simon DelloKU Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-6043-1206
Luk BruyneelKU Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-1209-692X
Walter SermeusKU Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-5915-1845

Funding

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 848031
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealthcare literature suggests that leadership behavior has a profound impact on nurse work-related well-being. Yet, more research is needed to better conceptualize, measure, and analyse the concepts of leadership and well-being, and to understand the psychological mechanisms underlying this association. Combining Self-Determination and Job Demands-Resources theory, this study aims to investigate the association between engaging leadership and burnout and work engagement among nurses by focusing on two explanatory mechanisms: perceived job characteristics (job demands and resources) and intrinsic motivation.

methodsA cross-sectional survey of 1117 direct care nurses (response rate = 25%) from 13 general acute care hospitals in Belgium. Validated instruments were used to measure nurses' perceptions of engaging leadership, burnout, work engagement, intrinsic motivation and job demands and job resources. Structural equation modeling was performed to test the hypothesised model which assumed a serial mediation of job characteristics and intrinsic motivation in the relationship of engaging leadership with nurse work-related well-being.

resultsConfirmatory factor analysis indicated a good fit of the measurement model. The findings offer support for the hypothesized model, indicating that engaging leadership is linked to enhanced well-being, as reflected in increased work engagement, and reduced burnout. The results further showed that this association is mediated by nurses' perceptions of job resources and intrinsic motivation. Notably, while job demands mediated the relationship between EL and nurses' well-being, the relationship became unsignificant when including intrinsic motivation as second mediator.

conclusionsEngaging leaders foster a favourable work environment for nursing staff which is not only beneficial for their work motivation but also for their work-related well-being. Engaging leadership and job resources are modifiable aspects of healthcare organisations. Interventions aimed at developing engaging leadership behaviours among nursing leaders and building job resources will help healthcare organisations to create favourable working conditions for their nurses.

trial registrationThe study described herein is funded under the European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation programme from 2020 to 2023 (Grant Agreement 848031). The protocol of Magnet4Europe is registered in the ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN10196901).

Indexed as

Burnout, ProfessionalMotivationCross-Sectional StudiesHumansJob SatisfactionLeadershipSurveys and QuestionnairesWorking ConditionsLeadershipMotivationWell-beingWork environment

Identifiers

PMID38225620
PMCPMC10788988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.