Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38225616›Full record

ArticleRespiratory research2024

Advancing accuracy in breath testing for lung cancer: strategies for improving diagnostic precision in imbalanced data.

Ke-Cheng Chen, Shuenn-Wen Kuo, Ruei-Hao Shie, Hsiao-Yu Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Respiratory research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ke-Cheng ChenDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Shuenn-Wen KuoDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ruei-Hao ShieGreen Energy and Environmental Research Laboratories, Industrial Technology Research Institute, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Hsiao-Yu YangInstitute of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, National Taiwan University College of Public Health, No. 17 Xuzhou Road, Taipei, 10055, Taiwan. hyang@ntu.edu.tw.

Funding

Ministry of Education NTU-112L9004National Science and Technology Council MOST 109-2314-B-002-166-MY3 and NSTC 112-2314-B-002-101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreath testing using an electronic nose has been recognized as a promising new technique for the early detection of lung cancer. Imbalanced data are commonly observed in electronic nose studies, but methods to address them are rarely reported.

objectiveThe objectives of this study were to assess the accuracy of electronic nose screening for lung cancer with imbalanced learning and to select the best mechanical learning algorithm.

methodsWe conducted a case‒control study that included patients with lung cancer and healthy controls and analyzed metabolites in exhaled breath using a carbon nanotube sensor array. The study used five machine learning algorithms to build predictive models and a synthetic minority oversampling technique to address imbalanced data. The diagnostic accuracy of lung cancer was assessed using pathology reports as the gold standard.

resultsWe enrolled 190 subjects between 2020 and 2023. A total of 155 subjects were used in the final analysis, which included 111 lung cancer patients and 44 healthy controls. We randomly divided samples into one training set, one internal validation set, and one external validation set. In the external validation set, the summary sensitivity was 0.88 (95% CI 0.84-0.91), the summary specificity was 1.00 (95% CI 0.85-1.00), the AUC was 0.96 (95% CI 0.94-0.98), the pAUC was 0.92 (95% CI 0.89-0.96), and the DOR was 207.62 (95% CI 24.62-924.64).

conclusionElectronic nose screening for lung cancer is highly accurate. The support vector machine algorithm is more suitable for analyzing chemical sensor data from electronic noses.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsVolatile Organic CompoundsBreath TestsCase-Control StudiesElectronic NoseExhalationHumansVolatile Organic CompoundsBreathomicsElectronic noseImbalanced learningVolatile metabolite

Identifiers

PMID38225616
PMCPMC10790556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.