ArticleRespiratory research2024
Advancing accuracy in breath testing for lung cancer: strategies for improving diagnostic precision in imbalanced data.
Article in Respiratory research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- eNose technologies in the detection of cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The oncologist · 2026Pooled it
- Diagnostic accuracy of machine learning approaches to identify psoriatic arthritis: a meta-analysis.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence Virtual Organoids (AIVOs).Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- Exhaled Aldehydes and Ketones as Biomarkers of Lung Cancer and Diabetes: Review of Sensor Technologies for Early Disease Diagnosis.Biosensors · 2025Review
- High Concordance of E-Nose-Derived Breathprints in a Healthy Population: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Observational
- Development of Electronic Nose as a Complementary Screening Tool for Breath Testing in Colorectal Cancer.Biosensors · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Powered Nanosensor Platforms for Non-Invasive Breathomic Diagnostics.Nanotechnology, science and applications · 2025Review
- Review
- Real-time breath gas analysis of methane using a multipass cell-based near-infrared gas sensor.Biomedical optics express · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBreath testing using an electronic nose has been recognized as a promising new technique for the early detection of lung cancer. Imbalanced data are commonly observed in electronic nose studies, but methods to address them are rarely reported.
objectiveThe objectives of this study were to assess the accuracy of electronic nose screening for lung cancer with imbalanced learning and to select the best mechanical learning algorithm.
methodsWe conducted a case‒control study that included patients with lung cancer and healthy controls and analyzed metabolites in exhaled breath using a carbon nanotube sensor array. The study used five machine learning algorithms to build predictive models and a synthetic minority oversampling technique to address imbalanced data. The diagnostic accuracy of lung cancer was assessed using pathology reports as the gold standard.
resultsWe enrolled 190 subjects between 2020 and 2023. A total of 155 subjects were used in the final analysis, which included 111 lung cancer patients and 44 healthy controls. We randomly divided samples into one training set, one internal validation set, and one external validation set. In the external validation set, the summary sensitivity was 0.88 (95% CI 0.84-0.91), the summary specificity was 1.00 (95% CI 0.85-1.00), the AUC was 0.96 (95% CI 0.94-0.98), the pAUC was 0.92 (95% CI 0.89-0.96), and the DOR was 207.62 (95% CI 24.62-924.64).
conclusionElectronic nose screening for lung cancer is highly accurate. The support vector machine algorithm is more suitable for analyzing chemical sensor data from electronic noses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.