Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38225582›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

Equity in vaccine coverage in Uganda from 2000 to 2016: revealing the multifaceted nature of inequity.

Anthony Ssebagereka, Gatien de Broucker, Elizabeth Ekirapa-Kiracho, Rornald Muhumuza Kananura, Alfred Driwale, Joshua Mak, Aloysius Mutebi, Bryan Nicholas Patenaude

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anthony SsebagerekaMakerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Gatien de BrouckerDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA. gdebroucker@jhu.edu.
Elizabeth Ekirapa-KirachoMakerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Rornald Muhumuza KananuraMakerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Alfred DriwaleUganda National Expanded Program On Immunization (UNEPI), Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Joshua MakDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA.
Aloysius MutebiMakerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Bryan Nicholas PatenaudeDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study analyses vaccine coverage and equity among children under five years of age in Uganda based on the 2016 Uganda Demographic and Health Survey (UDHS) dataset. Understanding equity in vaccine access and the determinants is crucial for the redress of emerging as well as persistent inequities.

methodsApplied to the UDHS for 2000, 2006, 2011, and 2016, the Vaccine Economics Research for Sustainability and Equity (VERSE) Equity Toolkit provides a multivariate assessment of immunization coverage and equity by (1) ranking the sample population with a composite direct unfairness index, (2) generating quantitative measure of efficiency (coverage) and equity, and (3) decomposing inequity into its contributing factors. The direct unfairness ranking variable is the predicted vaccination coverage from a logistic model based upon fair and unfair sources of variation in vaccination coverage. Our fair source of variation is defined as the child's age - children too young to receive routine immunization are not expected to be vaccinated. Unfair sources of variation are the child's region of residence, and whether they live in an urban or rural area, the mother's education level, the household's socioeconomic status, the child's sex, and their insurance coverage status. For each unfair source of variation, we identify a "more privileged" situation.

resultsThe coverage and equity of the Diphtheria-Pertussis-Tetanus vaccine, 3

conclusionThe past two decades have seen significant improvements in vaccine coverage and equity, thanks to the efforts to strengthen routine immunization and ongoing supplemental immunization activities such as the Family Health Days. While maintaining the regular provision of vaccines to all regions, efforts should be made to alleviate the impact of low maternal education and literacy on vaccination uptake.

Indexed as

Immunization ProgramsVaccinationChildChild, PreschoolDiphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis VaccineHumansInfantMeasles VaccineUgandaVaccination CoverageDiphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis VaccineMeasles VaccineAccess to healthcareDeterminants of healthImmunization scheduleNational medical storesUgandaVaccine coverageVaccine deliveryVaccine equityZero-dose

Identifiers

PMID38225582
PMCPMC10790460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.