Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38225577›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2024

Geriatric nutritional risk index and adverse medical outcomes among Egyptian patients admitted to a geriatric hospital: a prospective cohort study.

Hebatullah O Mohammed, Azza M Hassan, Aya Mostafa, Mohamed S Khater, Aisha Aboelfotoh, Khaled M Abd Elaziz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Multi-omics uncovers the critical role of ceramide-mediatedJournal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Optimizing Clinical Nutrition Management for Elderly Hospitalized Patients: Current Practices and Insights.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hebatullah O MohammedDepartment of community, environmental and occupational medicine. Faculty of medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, 11566, Egypt. hebatullah.o.diab@med.asu.edu.eg.
Azza M HassanDepartment of community, environmental and occupational medicine. Faculty of medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, 11566, Egypt.
Aya MostafaDepartment of community, environmental and occupational medicine. Faculty of medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, 11566, Egypt.
Mohamed S KhaterDepartment of geriatrics and gerontology. Faculty of medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, 11566, Egypt.
Aisha AboelfotohDepartment of community, environmental and occupational medicine. Faculty of medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, 11566, Egypt.
Khaled M Abd ElazizDepartment of community, environmental and occupational medicine. Faculty of medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, 11566, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElderly are one of the most heterogeneous and vulnerable groups who have a higher risk of nutritional problems. Malnutrition is prevalent among hospitalized elderly but underdiagnosed and almost undistinguishable from the changes in the aging process. The Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) is a tool created to predict nutrition-related complications in hospitalized patients. This study aims to measure the prevalence of nutritional risk using the GNRI among hospitalized elderly Egyptian inpatients and to determine the association between the GNRI and selected adverse clinical outcomes.

methodsA hospital-based prospective cohort study was conducted among 334 elderly patients admitted to a tertiary specialized geriatric university hospital in Cairo, Egypt from August 2021 to June 2022. Within 48 hours after hospital admission, socio-demographic characteristics, blood biomarkers, anthropometric measurements, and nutritional risk assessment by the GNRI score were obtained. Patients were divided into three groups based on their GNRI: high, low, and no nutritional risk (GNRI<92, 92-98, and >98) respectively. Patients were followed up for the occurrence of adverse outcomes during hospital stay (bed sores, Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs), hospital Length of Stay (LOS), and hospital mortality) and three months after discharge (non-improvement medical status, appearance of new medical conditions, hospital readmission and 90-day mortality). Multivariable regression and survival analysis were conducted.

resultsThe prevalence of high-nutritional risk was 45.5% (95% CI, 40%-51%). Patients with high risk had significantly longer LOS than those with no risk. The high-nutritional risk was significantly associated with the development of bed sores (Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) 4.89; 95% CI, 1.37-17.45), HAIs (AOR: 3.18; 95% CI, 1.48-6.83), and hospital mortality (AOR: 4.41; 95% CI, 1.04-18.59). The overall survival rate was significantly lower among patients with high-nutritional risk compared to those with no risk.

conclusionGNRI is a simple and easily applicable objective nutritional screening tool with high prognostic value in this Egyptian sample of patients. The findings of this study signal the initiation of the application of this tool to all geriatric hospitals in Egypt.

Indexed as

MalnutritionPressure UlcerAgedEgyptGeriatric AssessmentHospitalsHumansNutritional StatusNutrition AssessmentProspective StudiesRisk FactorsGeriatricLength of stayMalnutritionMortalityNutritional risk

Identifiers

PMID38225577
PMCPMC10789057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.