Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38225552›Full record

Trial reportBMC cancer2024

Efficacy and safety of add-on mirogabalin to conventional therapy for the treatment of peripheral neuropathic pain after thoracic surgery: the multicenter, randomized, open-label ADMIT-NeP study.

Takuro Miyazaki, Keitaro Matsumoto, Toshihiko Sato, Isao Sano, Katsuro Furukawa, Koichiro Shimoyama, Ryotaro Kamohara, Makoto Suzuki, Masamichi Kondou, Norihiko Ikeda and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Mirogabalin as a novel calcium channel αFrontiers in pharmacology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Takuro MiyazakiDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8501, Japan.
Keitaro MatsumotoDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8501, Japan.
Toshihiko SatoDepartment of General Thoracic, Breast, and Pediatric Surgery, Fukuoka University School of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan.
Isao SanoDepartment of Respiratory Surgery, The Japanese Red Cross Nagasaki Genbaku Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan.
Katsuro FurukawaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan.
Koichiro ShimoyamaChest Surgery, National Hospital Organization Nagasaki Medical Center, Omura, Japan.
Ryotaro KamoharaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Oita Prefectural Hospital, Oita, Japan.
Makoto SuzukiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Kumamoto University Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan.
Masamichi KondouDepartment of Thoracic and Breast Surgery, Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan.
Norihiko IkedaDepartment of Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Shunsuke TabataPrimary Medical Science Department, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazuhito ShiosakaiData Intelligence Department, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd, Tokyo, Japan.
Takeshi NagayasuDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8501, Japan. nagayasu@nagasaki-u.ac.jp.
ADMIT-NeP Study group
Daiichi-Sankyo (Japan) · JPKumamoto University Hospital · JPNagasaki University · JPTokyo Medical University · JPEhime Prefectural Central Hospital · JPFukuoka University · JPJapanese Red Cross Society, Japan · JPNagasaki Medical Center · JPOita Prefectural Hospital · JPSasebo City General Hospital · JPUreshino Medical Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor chronic pain after thoracic surgery, optimal timing of its diagnosis and effective treatment remains unresolved, although several treatment options are currently available. We examined the efficacy and safety of mirogabalin, in combination with conventional pain therapy (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and/or acetaminophen), for treating peripheral neuropathic pain (NeP) after thoracic surgery.

methodsIn this multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group study, patients with peripheral NeP were randomly assigned 1:1 to mirogabalin as add-on to conventional therapy or conventional treatment alone.

resultsOf 131 patients of consent obtained, 128 were randomized (mirogabalin add-on group, 63 patients; conventional treatment group, 65 patients). The least squares mean changes (95% confidence interval [CI]) in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score for pain intensity at rest from baseline to Week 8 (primary endpoint) were - 51.3 (- 54.9, - 47.7) mm in the mirogabalin add-on group and - 47.7 (- 51.2, - 44.2) mm in the conventional group (between-group difference: - 3.6 [95% CI: - 8.7, 1.5], P = 0.161). However, in patients with Self-administered Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (S-LANSS) score (used for the screening of NeP) ≥ 12 at baseline, the greater the S-LANSS score at baseline, the greater the decrease in VAS score in the mirogabalin add-on group, while no such trend was observed in the conventional treatment group (post hoc analysis). This between-group difference in trends was statistically significant (interaction P value = 0.014). Chronic pain was recorded in 7.9% vs. 16.9% of patients (P = 0.171) at Week 12 in the mirogabalin add-on vs. conventional treatment groups, respectively. Regarding activities of daily living (ADL) and quality of life (QOL), changes in Pain Disability Assessment Scale score and the EQ-5D-5L index value from baseline to Week 8 showed significant improvement in the mirogabalin add-on group vs. conventional treatment group (P < 0.001). The most common adverse events (AEs) in the mirogabalin add-on group were dizziness (12.7%), somnolence (7.9%), and urticaria (3.2%). Most AEs were mild or moderate in severity.

conclusionsAddition of mirogabalin to conventional therapy did not result in significant improvement in pain intensity based on VAS scores, but did result in significant improvement in ADL and QOL in patients with peripheral NeP after thoracic surgery.

trial registrationJapan Registry of Clinical Trials jRCTs071200053 (registered 17/11/2020).

Indexed as

Bridged Bicyclo CompoundsChronic PainNeuralgiaThoracic SurgeryActivities of Daily LivingHumansQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeBridged Bicyclo CompoundsmirogabalinChronic postsurgical painMirogabalinPostoperative neuropathic painPost thoracotomy pain syndromeThosracic surgery

Identifiers

PMID38225552
PMCPMC10788972
OpenAlexW4390885693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.