ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2024
Water quality modeling-based assessment for the scope of wastewater treatment of the urban reach of River Yamuna at Delhi, India.
Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Metagenome-based insights into bacteriophage diversity of an urban river ecosystem.Molecular biology reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
River water quality management is a tedious job as it comprises multiple variables. The River Yamuna, Delhi's urban reach, is highly contaminated with very low or zero freshwater flow during the non-monsoon periods. The river quality has been appraised for pre- and post-monsoon periods of 10 years of data collected from the Delhi Pollution Control Council (DPCC). A sharp declination of dissolved oxygen and acceleration of BOD have been observed after the outfalling of drain 1. The wastewater treatment plants data for 2020-2022 have been analyzed, and the removal efficiencies of BOD and COD were found between 65 and 94%. The BIOFORE technology has shown maximum removal efficiencies, around 94% and 89% for BOD and COD, respectively. The level of treatment has been evaluated by developing a water quality model with the existing QUAL2kw framework. Twelve strategies have been generated for four levels of treatment and three different flow conditions. The severely polluted reach of Yamuna has low self-purification capacity; flow augmentation has little effect on the existing load. Hence, the level of treatment required to increase. After the introduction of outfalling drain D13-D16, a sag of DO has been observed; to improve the DO concentration, external aeration is suggested before wastewater disposal into the river. The study is a novel effort to manage the river quality by developing scenarios, including the level of treatments and flow augmentation, and keeping up the desired DO concentration assigned for this river reach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38225506What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.