Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38225506›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2024

Water quality modeling-based assessment for the scope of wastewater treatment of the urban reach of River Yamuna at Delhi, India.

Nibedita Verma, Geeta Singh, Naved Ahsan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nibedita VermaDepartment of Environmental Engineering, Delhi Technological University, New Delhi, Delhi, 110042, India.
Geeta SinghDepartment of Environmental Engineering, Delhi Technological University, New Delhi, Delhi, 110042, India. geeta.singh@dce.ac.in.
Naved AhsanCivil Engineering Department, Jamia Millia Islamia University, Jamia Nagar, New Delhi, 110025, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

River water quality management is a tedious job as it comprises multiple variables. The River Yamuna, Delhi's urban reach, is highly contaminated with very low or zero freshwater flow during the non-monsoon periods. The river quality has been appraised for pre- and post-monsoon periods of 10 years of data collected from the Delhi Pollution Control Council (DPCC). A sharp declination of dissolved oxygen and acceleration of BOD have been observed after the outfalling of drain 1. The wastewater treatment plants data for 2020-2022 have been analyzed, and the removal efficiencies of BOD and COD were found between 65 and 94%. The BIOFORE technology has shown maximum removal efficiencies, around 94% and 89% for BOD and COD, respectively. The level of treatment has been evaluated by developing a water quality model with the existing QUAL2kw framework. Twelve strategies have been generated for four levels of treatment and three different flow conditions. The severely polluted reach of Yamuna has low self-purification capacity; flow augmentation has little effect on the existing load. Hence, the level of treatment required to increase. After the introduction of outfalling drain D13-D16, a sag of DO has been observed; to improve the DO concentration, external aeration is suggested before wastewater disposal into the river. The study is a novel effort to manage the river quality by developing scenarios, including the level of treatments and flow augmentation, and keeping up the desired DO concentration assigned for this river reach.

Indexed as

Water PurificationWater QualityEnvironmental MonitoringIndiaRiversWastewaterWastewaterBiochemical oxygen demandDissolved oxygenExtended aerationFlow augmentationQUAL2Kw

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.