Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38225497›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental science and pollution research international2024

Recent advances in boron removal in aqueous media. An approach to the adsorption process and process optimization.

Jéssica Carolaine Vieira de Azevedo, Ana Paula Fonseca Maia de Urzedo, Patrícia da Luz Mesquita, Roberto Guimarães da Cunha Filho, Eduardo Prado Baston, Gisella Lamas Samanamud, Luzia Lima Rezende Naves, Fabiano Luiz Naves

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jéssica Carolaine Vieira de AzevedoChemical Engineering Department, Research Group On Waste Treatment and Management Processes, Federal University of Sao João Del Rei, São João Del Rei, MG, Brazil.
Ana Paula Fonseca Maia de UrzedoChemical Engineering Department, Research Group On Waste Treatment and Management Processes, Federal University of Sao João Del Rei, São João Del Rei, MG, Brazil.
Patrícia da Luz MesquitaChemical Engineering Department, Research Group On Waste Treatment and Management Processes, Federal University of Sao João Del Rei, São João Del Rei, MG, Brazil.
Roberto Guimarães da Cunha FilhoChemical Engineering Department, Research Group On Waste Treatment and Management Processes, Federal University of Sao João Del Rei, São João Del Rei, MG, Brazil.
Eduardo Prado BastonChemical Engineering Department, Research Group On Waste Treatment and Management Processes, Federal University of Sao João Del Rei, São João Del Rei, MG, Brazil.
Gisella Lamas SamanamudDepartment of Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Kentucky - Paducah extended campus, Paducah, KY, 42001, USA.
Luzia Lima Rezende NavesChemical Engineering Department, Research Group On Waste Treatment and Management Processes, Federal University of Sao João Del Rei, São João Del Rei, MG, Brazil.
Fabiano Luiz NavesChemical Engineering Department, Research Group On Waste Treatment and Management Processes, Federal University of Sao João Del Rei, São João Del Rei, MG, Brazil. fabianonavesengenheiro@ufsj.edu.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2022-0364
Federal University of São João del-Rei · BRUniversity of Kentucky · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The numerous oxidation states of the element boron bring great challenges in containing its contamination in receptor bodies. This scenario increases significantly due to the widespread use of boron compounds in various industries in recent years. For this reason, the removal of this contaminant is receiving worldwide attention. Although adsorption is a promising method in boron removal, finding suitable adsorbents, that is, those with high efficiency, and feasible remains a constant challenge. Hence, this review presents the boron removal methods in comparison to costs of adsorbents, reaction mechanisms, economic viability, continuous bed application, and regeneration capacity. In addition, the approach of multivariate algorithms in the solution of multiobjective problems can enable the optimized conditions of dosage of adsorbents and coagulants, pH, and initial concentration of boron. Therefore, this review sought to comprehensively and critically demonstrate strategic issues that may guide the choice of method and adsorbent or coagulant material in future research for bench and industrial scale boron removal.

Indexed as

Water Pollutants, ChemicalWater PurificationAdsorptionBoronWaterBoronWaterWater Pollutants, ChemicalAdsorption processBoron removalMultiobjective optimization

Identifiers

PMID38225497
OpenAlexW4390907524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.