Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38225397›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2024

Comparison of brain nicotine accumulation from traditional combustible cigarettes and electronic cigarettes with different formulations.

Yantao Zuo, Kiran Kumar Solingapuram Sai, Aeva Jazic, Avinash H Bansode, Jed E Rose, Alexey G Mukhin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Continuous Nicotine Monitors for Personal Nicotine Pharmacokinetics: A Receptor-Aware Research Agenda.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yantao Zuo *Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Scholl of Medicine, Durham, NC, 27705, USA.
Kiran Kumar Solingapuram Sai *Department of Radiological Sciences, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA.
Aeva JazicDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Scholl of Medicine, Durham, NC, 27705, USA.
Avinash H BansodeDepartment of Radiological Sciences, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA.
Jed E RoseDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Scholl of Medicine, Durham, NC, 27705, USA.
Alexey G MukhinDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Scholl of Medicine, Durham, NC, 27705, USA. Alexey.mukhin@roseresearchcenter.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7268-1322

Funding

E-cigarettes: deposition, absorption and brain accumulation of nicotineR01DA044756 · NIDA · ROSE RESEARCH CENTER, LLC · PI MUKHIN, ALEXEY G · 2017 to 2022
$3.3M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA044756
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid brain accumulation is critical for the acute reinforcing effects of nicotine. Although nicotine formulation (free-base vs. protonated or salt) in electronic cigarette (E-cig) liquid affects user satisfaction, its impact on brain nicotine accumulation (BNA) from E-cig use has not been evaluated in comparison with traditional combustible cigarettes (C-cigs) using a within-subjects design. BNA was directly assessed with 29 adult dual users (13 females) of E-cigs and C-cigs, using [

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsTobacco ProductsAdultBrainFemaleHumansMaleNicotineSmokeNicotineSmoke

Identifiers

PMID38225397
PMCPMC10876700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.