Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38225381›Full record

ArticleMolecular psychiatry2024

Examining intergenerational risk factors for conduct problems using polygenic scores in the Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study.

Leonard Frach, Wikus Barkhuizen, Andrea G Allegrini, Helga Ask, Laurie J Hannigan, Elizabeth C Corfield, Ole A Andreassen, Frank Dudbridge, Eivind Ystrom, Alexandra Havdahl and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Research Review: A review of the past decade of family and genomic studies on adolescent mental health.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Leonard FrachDepartment of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, Division of Psychology & Language Sciences, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK. leonard.frach.20@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-6349-8772
Wikus BarkhuizenDepartment of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, Division of Psychology & Language Sciences, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5170-1470
Andrea G AllegriniDepartment of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, Division of Psychology & Language Sciences, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4048-4292
Helga AskCenter for Genetic Epidemiology and Mental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-0149-5319
Laurie J HanniganCenter for Genetic Epidemiology and Mental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-3123-5411
Elizabeth C CorfieldCenter for Genetic Epidemiology and Mental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-0119-157X
Ole A AndreassenNORMENT Centre, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital & Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-4461-3568
Frank DudbridgeDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8817-8908
Eivind YstromCenter for Genetic Epidemiology and Mental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-4390-6171
Alexandra Havdahl *Center for Genetic Epidemiology and Mental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-9268-0423
Jean-Baptiste Pingault *Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, Division of Psychology & Language Sciences, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2557-4716
Norwegian Institute of Public Health · NOKing's College London · GBLeonard Cheshire · GBOslo University Hospital · NOUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Leicester · GB

Funding

EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council) 863981Medical Research Council MR/S037055/1Norges Forskningsråd (Research Council of Norway) 223273Norges Forskningsråd (Research Council of Norway) 274611Norges Forskningsråd (Research Council of Norway) 288083Norges Forskningsråd (Research Council of Norway) 300668Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust (Wellcome) 224092/Z/21/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aetiology of conduct problems involves a combination of genetic and environmental factors, many of which are inherently linked to parental characteristics given parents' central role in children's lives across development. It is important to disentangle to what extent links between parental heritable characteristics and children's behaviour are due to transmission of genetic risk or due to parental indirect genetic influences via the environment (i.e., genetic nurture). We used 31,290 genotyped mother-father-child trios from the Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study (MoBa), testing genetic transmission and genetic nurture effects on conduct problems using 13 polygenic scores (PGS) spanning psychiatric conditions, substance use, education-related factors, and other risk factors. Maternal or self-reports of conduct problems at ages 8 and 14 years were available for up to 15,477 children. We found significant genetic transmission effects on conduct problems for 12 out of 13 PGS at age 8 years (strongest association: PGS for smoking, β = 0.07, 95% confidence interval = [0.05, 0.08]) and for 4 out of 13 PGS at age 14 years (strongest association: PGS for externalising problems, β = 0.08, 95% confidence interval = [0.05, 0.11]). Conversely, we did not find genetic nurture effects for conduct problems using our selection of PGS. Our findings provide evidence for genetic transmission in the association between parental characteristics and child conduct problems. Our results may also indicate that genetic nurture via traits indexed by our polygenic scores is of limited aetiological importance for conduct problems-though effects of small magnitude or effects via parental traits not captured by the included PGS remain a possibility.

Indexed as

Conduct DisorderMultifactorial InheritanceAdolescentAdultChildCohort StudiesFathersFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenotypeHumansMaleMothersNorwayProblem BehaviorRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID38225381
PMCPMC11176059
OpenAlexW4390916208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.