Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38225344›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Benefits of thermal and distance-filtered imaging for wayfinding with prosthetic vision.

Roksana Sadeghi, Arathy Kartha, Michael P Barry, Paul Gibson, Avi Caspi, Arup Roy, Duane R Geruschat, Gislin Dagnelie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Motion perception with visual prostheses.Progress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Static or Temporal? Semantic Scene Simplification to Aid Wayfinding in Immersive Simulations of Bionic Vision.Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology. ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Roksana SadeghiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. roksana.s.sadeghi@gmail.com.
Arathy KarthaDepartment of Biological and Vision Sciences, State University of New York College of Optometry, New York, NY, USA.
Michael P BarryDepartment of Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Paul GibsonAdvanced Medical Electronics Corporation, Maple Grove, MN, USA.
Avi CaspiJerusalem College of Technology, Jerusalem, Israel.
Arup RoyZikron, Inc., Campbell, CA, USA.
Duane R GeruschatDepartment of Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Gislin DagnelieDepartment of Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

Distance Filtering System for Retinal ImplantsR42EY025136 · NEI · ADVANCED MEDICAL ELECTRONICS CORPORATION · PI DAGNELIE, GISLIN · 2015 to 2017
$2.2M
Retinal Prosthesis with Enhanced Thermal ImagingR44EY024498 · NEI · ADVANCED MEDICAL ELECTRONICS CORPORATION · PI SEIFERT, GREGORY JOHN · 2016 to 2017
$1.4M
NEI NIH HHS R42 EY025136NEI NIH HHS R44 EY024498
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual prostheses such as the Argus II provide partial vision for individuals with limited or no light perception. However, their effectiveness in daily life situations is limited by scene complexity and variability. We investigated whether additional image processing techniques could improve mobility performance in everyday indoor environments. A mobile system connected to the Argus II provided thermal or distance-filtered video stimulation. Four participants used the thermal camera to locate a person and the distance filter to navigate a hallway with obstacles. The thermal camera allowed for finding a target person in 99% of trials, while unfiltered video led to confusion with other objects and a success rate of only 55% ([Formula: see text]). Similarly, the distance filter enabled participants to detect and avoid 88% of obstacles by removing background clutter, whereas unfiltered video resulted in a detection rate of only 10% ([Formula: see text]). For any given elapsed time, the success rate with filtered video was higher than with unfiltered video. After 90 s, participants' success rate reached above 50% with filtered video and 24% and 3% with normal camera in the first and second tasks, respectively. Despite individual variations, all participants showed significant improvement when using the thermal and distance filters compared to unfiltered video. Adding a thermal and distance filter to a visual prosthesis system can enhance the performance of mobility activities by removing clutter in the background, showing people and warm objects with the thermal camera, or nearby obstacles with the distance filter.

Indexed as

Visual ProsthesisDiagnostic ImagingHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedProsthesis ImplantationVision Disorders

Identifiers

PMID38225344
PMCPMC10789760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.