ArticleScientific reports2024
Efficacy of endophytic bacteria as promising inducers for enhancing the immune responses in tomato plants and managing Rhizoctonia root-rot disease.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- DecodingPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Biological Control of Tomato Root Rot Caused byJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Biological control of a novel strain Bacillus velezensis BFWR11 against tomato early blight.Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · 2026Article
- Exploring the Functional Roles of Endophytic Bacteria in Plant Stress Tolerance for Sustainable Agriculture: Diversity, Mechanisms, Applications, and Challenges.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Endophytic nanotechnology as a dual-action approach against agricultural and clinical fungal pathogens.Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
- Diversity, molecular identification and plant growth promoting potential of endophytic bacteria from plantain (Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Biocontrol ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Bio-stimulants for plant growth promotion and sustainable management of Rhizoctonia Solani causing black scurf of potato tubers.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Bacillus spp. induce defense mechanism and elicit expression of PR-protein genes in tomato against Rhizoctonia solani.Molecular biology reports · 2025Article
- From microbiome to biostimulants: unlocking the potential of tomato root endophytes.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Exploring the Potential of Bacterial Endophytes in Plant Disease Management.Current microbiology · 2024Review
- The Research of Antagonistic Endophytic BacteriumMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- Factors affecting the production of sugarcane yield and sucrose accumulation: suggested potential biological solutions.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Review
- Isolation and identification of a novelFrontiers in plant science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Around the world, a variety of crops, including tomatoes, suffer serious economic losses due to the Rhizoctonia root-rot disease. Herein, Bacillus velezensis, Bacillus megaterium, and Herpaspirillum huttiense isolated from strawberry (Fragaria chiloensis var. ananassa) plants were pragmatic as plant growth promotors for battling the Rhizoctonia root rot disease and bringing about defense mechanisms as well as growth promotional strategies in tomato plants. These endophytic bacteria demonstrated potent antifungal activity against R. solani in vitro along in vivo. Data explained that the isolated endophytic bacteria could produce Indole acetic acid, Gibberellic acid GA, and siderophore as well as solubilize phosphate in the soil. The consortium of (Bacillus velezensis, Bacillus megaterium, and Herpaspirillum huttiense) increased the protection % against Rhizoctonia infection by (79.4%), followed by B. velezensis by (73.52%), H. huttiense by (70.5%), and B. megaterium by (67.64%), respectively. There was an increase in soluble proteins and carbohydrates in infected plants treated with a consortium of endophytic bacteria by 30.7% and 100.2% over untreated infected plants, respectively. Applying endophytic bacteria either alone or in combination lowered the level of malondialdehyde MDA and hydrogen peroxide H
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.