ArticleScientific reports2024
Construction of an abnormal glycosylation risk model and its application in predicting the prognosis of patients with head and neck cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comprehensive Bioinformatics Analysis of Glycosylation-Related Genes and Potential Therapeutic Targets in Colorectal Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is the most common malignant tumor of the head and neck, and the incidence rate is increasing year by year. Protein post-translational modification, recognized as a pivotal and extensive form of protein modification, has been established to possess a profound association with tumor occurrence and progression. This study employed bioinformatics analysis utilizing transcriptome sequencing data, patient survival data, and clinical data from HNSCC to establish predictive markers of genes associated with glycosylation as prognostic risk markers. The R procedure WGCNA was employed to construct a gene co-expression network using the gene expression profile and clinical characteristics of HNSCC samples. Multiple Cox Proportional Hazards Regression Model (Cox regression) and LASSO analysis were conducted to identify the key genes exhibiting the strongest association with prognosis. A risk score, known as the glycosylation-related genes risk score (GLRS), was subsequently formulated utilizing the aforementioned core genes. This scoring system facilitated the classification of samples into high-risk and low-risk categories, thereby enabling the prediction of patient prognosis. The association between GLRS and clinical variables was examined through both univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis. The validation of six core genes was accomplished using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). The findings demonstrated noteworthy variations in risk scores among subgroups, thereby affirming the efficacy of GLRS in prognosticating patient outcomes. Furthermore, a correlation has been observed between the risk-scoring model and immune infiltration. Moreover, significant disparities exist in the expression levels of diverse immune checkpoints, epithelial-mesenchymal transition genes, and angiogenic factors between the high and low-risk groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.