Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38224956›Full record

ArticleFEMS microbiology ecology2024

Long-term conservation tillage with reduced nitrogen fertilization intensity can improve winter wheat health via positive plant-microorganism feedback in the rhizosphere.

Jan Helge Behr, Theresa Kuhl-Nagel, Loreen Sommermann, Narges Moradtalab, Soumitra Paul Chowdhury, Michael Schloter, Saskia Windisch, Ingo Schellenberg, Lorrie Maccario, Søren J Sørensen and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FEMS microbiology ecology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
14.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Jan Helge BehrLeibniz Institute of Vegetable and Ornamental Crops (IGZ), Plant-Microbe Systems, Theodor-Echtermeyer-Weg 1, 14979 Großbeeren, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8402-9251
Theresa Kuhl-NagelLeibniz Institute of Vegetable and Ornamental Crops (IGZ), Plant-Microbe Systems, Theodor-Echtermeyer-Weg 1, 14979 Großbeeren, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4711-6129
Loreen SommermannAnhalt University of Applied Sciences, Department of Agriculture , Ecotrophology and Landscape Development, Strenzfelder Allee 28, 06406 Bernburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6293-877X
Narges MoradtalabUniversity of Hohenheim, Institute of Crop Science (340 h), Fruwirthstraße 20, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9314-1771
Soumitra Paul ChowdhuryInstitute of Network Biology , Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH), Ingolstaedter Landstraße 1, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8576-8857
Michael SchloterResearch Unit for Comparative Microbiome Analysis (COMI), Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH), Ingolstaedter Landstraße 1, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1671-1125
Saskia WindischUniversity of Hohenheim, Institute of Crop Science (340 h), Fruwirthstraße 20, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7808-1275
Ingo SchellenbergAnhalt University of Applied Sciences, Department of Agriculture , Ecotrophology and Landscape Development, Strenzfelder Allee 28, 06406 Bernburg, Germany.
Lorrie MaccarioUniversity of Copenhagen, Department of Biology, Section of Microbiology, Universitetsparken 15, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-6069-6463
Søren J SørensenUniversity of Copenhagen, Department of Biology, Section of Microbiology, Universitetsparken 15, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-6227-9906
Michael RothballerInstitute of Network Biology , Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH), Ingolstaedter Landstraße 1, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4881-2705
Joerg GeistlingerAnhalt University of Applied Sciences, Department of Agriculture , Ecotrophology and Landscape Development, Strenzfelder Allee 28, 06406 Bernburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5136-2819
Kornelia SmallaJulius Kühn Institute (JKI) - Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Institute for Epidemiology and Pathogen Diagnostics, Messeweg 11-12, 38104 Braunschweig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7653-5560
Uwe LudewigUniversity of Hohenheim, Institute of Crop Science (340 h), Fruwirthstraße 20, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5456-1055
Günter NeumannUniversity of Hohenheim, Institute of Crop Science (340 h), Fruwirthstraße 20, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1539-2815
Rita GroschLeibniz Institute of Vegetable and Ornamental Crops (IGZ), Plant-Microbe Systems, Theodor-Echtermeyer-Weg 1, 14979 Großbeeren, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7179-5715
Doreen BabinJulius Kühn Institute (JKI) - Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Institute for Epidemiology and Pathogen Diagnostics, Messeweg 11-12, 38104 Braunschweig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7144-8898
University of Hohenheim · DEAnhalt University of Applied Sciences · DEHelmholtz Zentrum München · DELeibniz Institute of Vegetable and Ornamental Crops · DEJulius Kühn-Institut · DEUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

Federal Ministry of Education and Research 031A560A-F
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbiome-based solutions are regarded key for sustainable agroecosystems. However, it is unclear how agricultural practices affect the rhizosphere microbiome, plant-microorganism interactions and crop performance under field conditions. Therefore, we installed root observation windows in a winter wheat field cultivated either under long-term mouldboard plough (MP) or cultivator tillage (CT). Each tillage practice was also compared at two nitrogen (N) fertilization intensities, intensive (recommended N-supply with pesticides/growth regulators) or extensive (reduced N-supply, no fungicides/growth regulators). Shoot biomass, root exudates and rhizosphere metabolites, physiological stress indicators, and gene expression were analyzed together with the rhizosphere microbiome (bacterial/archaeal 16S rRNA gene, fungal ITS amplicon, and shotgun metagenome sequencing) shortly before flowering. Compared to MP, the rhizosphere of CT winter wheat contained more primary and secondary metabolites, especially benzoxazinoid derivatives. Potential copiotrophic and plant-beneficial taxa (e.g. Bacillus, Devosia, and Trichoderma) as well as functional genes (e.g. siderophore production, trehalose synthase, and ACC deaminase) were enriched in the CT rhizosphere, suggesting that tillage affected belowground plant-microorganism interactions. In addition, physiological stress markers were suppressed in CT winter wheat compared to MP. In summary, tillage practice was a major driver of crop performance, root deposits, and rhizosphere microbiome interactions, while the N-fertilization intensity was also relevant, but less important.

Indexed as

BacteriaTriticumFeedbackFertilizationPlant RootsRhizosphereRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoilSoil MicrobiologyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoil16S rRNA geneITS Illumina amplicon sequencingmineral fertilizationroot exudatesshotgun metagenome sequencingsustainable agriculture

Identifiers

PMID38224956
PMCPMC10847717
OpenAlexW4390893768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.