ArticleThe Journal of allergy and clinical immunology2024
Proceedings from the inaugural Artificial Intelligence in Primary Immune Deficiencies (AIPID) conference.
Article in The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rethinking secondary immunodeficiency: a cross-domain pathway framework for risk stratification.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Implementing calculated globulin screening for immunodeficiencies: The benefits and challenges.Journal of human immunity · 2026Review
- Emerging trends and research hot spots in inborn error of immunity: A bibliometric perspective.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2026Article
- Retrieval-Augmented Language Models for Clinical Decision Support in the Classification of Inborn Errors of Immunity.Journal of clinical immunology · 2026Article
- Proceedings of the second Artificial Intelligence in Primary Immunodeficiency (AIPI) meeting.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2026Article
- Exploring the strengths and limitations of AI-driven variant prioritization versus manual curation in inborn errors of immunity.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in medicine: Current applications in cardiology, oncology, and radiology.World journal of methodology · 2025Review
- Inborn errors of immunity: Manifestation, treatment, and outcome-an ESID registry 1994-2024 report on 30,628 patients.Journal of human immunity · 2025Article
- Application of Artificial Intelligence in Inborn Errors of Immunity Identification and Management: Past, Present, and Future-A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Decoding Immunodeficiencies with Artificial Intelligence: A New Era of Precision Medicine.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Navigating disruption in the PID landscape: embracing opportunities and anticipating threats in the next ten years.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Building alliances for early detection of immunodeficiencies: from primary care to hematology.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- New tools for diagnosis of primary immunodeficiencies: from awareness to artificial intelligence.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Here, we summarize the proceedings of the inaugural Artificial Intelligence in Primary Immune Deficiencies conference, during which experts and advocates gathered to advance research into the applications of artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning, and other computational tools in the diagnosis and management of inborn errors of immunity (IEIs). The conference focused on the key themes of expediting IEI diagnoses, challenges in data collection, roles of natural language processing and large language models in interpreting electronic health records, and ethical considerations in implementation. Innovative AI-based tools trained on electronic health records and claims databases have discovered new patterns of warning signs for IEIs, facilitating faster diagnoses and enhancing patient outcomes. Challenges in training AIs persist on account of data limitations, especially in cases of rare diseases, overlapping phenotypes, and biases inherent in current data sets. Furthermore, experts highlighted the significance of ethical considerations, data protection, and the necessity for open science principles. The conference delved into regulatory frameworks, equity in access, and the imperative for collaborative efforts to overcome these obstacles and harness the transformative potential of AI. Concerted efforts to successfully integrate AI into daily clinical immunology practice are still needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.