Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38224545›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2024

Heritability of cognitive and emotion processing during functional MRI in a twin sample.

Haeme R P Park, Miranda R Chilver, Yann Quidé, Arthur Montalto, Peter R Schofield, Leanne M Williams, Justine M Gatt

Abstract readTwin Study
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Haeme R P ParkNeuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8680-4346
Miranda R ChilverNeuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5796-4095
Yann QuidéNeuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8569-7139
Arthur MontaltoNeuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4906-1237
Peter R SchofieldNeuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2967-9662
Leanne M WilliamsPsychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford University, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9987-7360
Justine M GattNeuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9276-6358

Funding

Australian Government Research Training Program ScholarshipAustralian Research Council LP0883621National Health and Medical Research Council 1037196National Health and Medical Research Council 1079102National Health and Medical Research Council 1122816National Health and Medical Research Council 1176716Neuroscience Research AustraliaUNSW Tuition Fee Scholarship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite compelling evidence that brain structure is heritable, the evidence for the heritability of task-evoked brain function is less robust. Findings from previous studies are inconsistent possibly reflecting small samples and methodological variations. In a large national twin sample, we systematically evaluated heritability of task-evoked brain activity derived from functional magnetic resonance imaging. We used established standardised tasks to engage brain regions involved in cognitive and emotional functions. Heritability was evaluated across a conscious and nonconscious Facial Expressions of Emotion Task (FEET), selective attention Oddball Task, N-back task of working memory maintenance, and a Go-NoGo cognitive control task in a sample of Australian adult twins (N ranged from 136 to 226 participants depending on the task and pairs). Two methods for quantifying associations of heritability and brain activity were utilised; a multivariate independent component analysis (ICA) approach and a univariate brain region-of-interest (ROI) approach. Using ICA, we observed that a significant proportion of task-evoked brain activity was heritable, with estimates ranging from 23% to 26% for activity elicited by nonconscious facial emotion stimuli, 27% to 34% for N-back working memory maintenance and sustained attention, and 32% to 33% for selective attention in the Oddball task. Using the ROI approach, we found that activity of regions specifically implicated in emotion processing and selective attention showed significant heritability for three ROIs, including estimates of 33%-34% for the left and right amygdala in the nonconscious processing of sad faces and 29% in the medial superior prefrontal cortex for the Oddball task. Although both approaches show similar levels of heritability for the Nonconscious Faces and Oddball tasks, ICA results displayed a more extensive network of heritable brain function, including additional regions beyond the ROI analysis. Furthermore, multivariate twin modelling of both ICA networks and ROI activation suggested a mix of common genetic and unique environmental factors that contribute to the associations between networks/regions. Together, the results indicate a complex relationship between genetic factors and environmental interactions that ultimately give rise to neural activation underlying cognition and emotion.

Indexed as

BrainBrain MappingAdultAustraliaCognitionEmotionsHumansMagnetic Resonance Imagingattentionemotionfunctional MRIheritabilitytwinworking memory

Identifiers

PMID38224545
PMCPMC10785190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.