Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38224481›Full record

ArticleJMIR mental health2024

Developing a Framework to Infer Opioid Use Disorder Severity From Clinical Notes to Inform Natural Language Processing Methods: Characterization Study.

Melissa N Poulsen, Philip J Freda, Vanessa Troiani, Danielle L Mowery

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mental health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Melissa N Poulsen *Department of Population Health Sciences, Geisinger, Danville, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5915-371X
Philip J Freda *Department of Computational Biomedicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8658-9802
Vanessa TroianiDepartment of Autism and Developmental Medicine, Geisinger, Danville, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6689-8157
Danielle L MoweryDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Institute of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3802-4457

Funding

Synergy Core (SynC)P50DA054071 · NIDA · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI Daniel A Jacobson · 2022 to 2026
$13.1M
Supplemental Application for Clinical and Genetic Risk Profile of Opioid Use DisorderR01DA044015 · NIDA · GEISINGER CLINIC · PI BERRETTINI, WADE H, ROBISHAW, JANET D · 2017 to 2021
$4.5M
Understanding the role of community determinants in opioid use disorder and program implementation factors influencing patient adherence to opioid agonist therapyK01DA049903 · NIDA · GEISINGER CLINIC · PI POULSEN, MELISSA · 2020 to 2024
$810k
NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA049903NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA054071NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA044015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInformation regarding opioid use disorder (OUD) status and severity is important for patient care. Clinical notes provide valuable information for detecting and characterizing problematic opioid use, necessitating development of natural language processing (NLP) tools, which in turn requires reliably labeled OUD-relevant text and understanding of documentation patterns.

objectiveTo inform automated NLP methods, we aimed to develop and evaluate an annotation schema for characterizing OUD and its severity, and to document patterns of OUD-relevant information within clinical notes of heterogeneous patient cohorts.

methodsWe developed an annotation schema to characterize OUD severity based on criteria from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition. In total, 2 annotators reviewed clinical notes from key encounters of 100 adult patients with varied evidence of OUD, including patients with and those without chronic pain, with and without medication treatment for OUD, and a control group. We completed annotations at the sentence level. We calculated severity scores based on annotation of note text with 18 classes aligned with criteria for OUD severity and determined positive predictive values for OUD severity.

resultsThe annotation schema contained 27 classes. We annotated 1436 sentences from 82 patients; notes of 18 patients (11 of whom were controls) contained no relevant information. Interannotator agreement was above 70% for 11 of 15 batches of reviewed notes. Severity scores for control group patients were all 0. Among noncontrol patients, the mean severity score was 5.1 (SD 3.2), indicating moderate OUD, and the positive predictive value for detecting moderate or severe OUD was 0.71. Progress notes and notes from emergency department and outpatient settings contained the most and greatest diversity of information. Substance misuse and psychiatric classes were most prevalent and highly correlated across note types with high co-occurrence across patients.

conclusionsImplementation of the annotation schema demonstrated strong potential for inferring OUD severity based on key information in a small set of clinical notes and highlighting where such information is documented. These advancements will facilitate NLP tool development to improve OUD prevention, diagnosis, and treatment.

Indexed as

Chronic PainOpioid-Related DisordersAdultControl GroupsHumansNatural Language ProcessingOutpatientsadultadultsannotationannotation schemaclinical notesmental healthnatural language processingopioidopioid related disordersopioid use disorderseverity scoresubstance misusesubstance use disorders

Identifiers

PMID38224481
PMCPMC10825772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.