Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38224474›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2024

Exploring Adolescents' Attitudes Toward Mental Health Apps: Concurrent Mixed Methods Study.

Helene Høgsdal, Henriette Kyrrestad, Marte Rye, Sabine Kaiser

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Developing a Safety Planning Smartphone App to Support Adolescents' Self-Management During Emotional Crises.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Helene HøgsdalRegional Centre for Child and Youth Mental Health and Child Welfare - North, Faculty of Health Sciences, Tromsø, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3449-7740
Henriette KyrrestadRegional Centre for Child and Youth Mental Health and Child Welfare - North, Faculty of Health Sciences, Tromsø, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1515-6502
Marte RyeRegional Centre for Child and Youth Mental Health and Child Welfare - North, Faculty of Health Sciences, Tromsø, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5253-4539
Sabine KaiserRegional Centre for Child and Youth Mental Health and Child Welfare - North, Faculty of Health Sciences, Tromsø, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2081-7734
Center for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Eastern and Southern Norway · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdolescence is a critical time in which many psychological disorders develop. Mental health promotion is important, especially during this period. In recent years, an increasing number of mobile apps geared toward mental health promotion and preventing mental illness have been developed specifically for adolescents, with the goal of strengthening their mental health and well-being.

objectiveThis study aims to explore adolescents' attitudes toward mental health apps, as well as the perceived usefulness of mental health apps.

methodsIn this mixed methods study, a total of 183 adolescents (mean age 15.62, SD 3.21 years) answered a cross-sectional questionnaire, with 10 questions (eg, "What do you think about mental health apps in general?"). To complement the quantitative findings, individual interviews were conducted with 9 adolescents, during which they could elaborate on their opinions about mental health apps.

resultsA total of 30% (56/183) of the adolescents in the quantitative study had used a mental health app. Over half of the respondents (77/126, 61.1%) reported that they would use a mental health app if they had a mental health problem as well as that they thought mental health apps were somewhat or very useful (114/183, 62.3%). Availability was the most frequently reported advantage of mental health apps (107/183, 58.8%). Possible associated costs of mental health apps were the most frequently mentioned barrier to their use (87/183, 47.5%). Findings from the interviews also pointed to the importance of the availability of mental health apps as well as their credibility and potential to provide adolescents with autonomy when seeking mental health advice and help.

conclusionsOverall, the results indicate that adolescents have a positive attitude toward and an interest in mental health apps. However, adolescents are also more or less unaware of such apps, which might be one reason why they are often not used. The findings of this study have important implications for future research on mental health apps and for developers of mental health apps that target young people. The insights gained from this study can inform the development of more effective mental health apps that better meet the needs and preferences of adolescents.

Indexed as

adolescentadolescentsappapplicationapplicationsappscross sectionalmental healthmental health applicationsmobile healthopinionopinionsquestionnairesurveysurveysyouth

Identifiers

PMID38224474
PMCPMC10825759
OpenAlexW4390878033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.